Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-03

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 4.0)

The table illustrate given the number of households in the US by their yearly income in 2007,2011 and 2015.

overview, The chart shows that how describe the number of household millions.And Also, The number of us hosuhold in millions,by annual income.Frequently,some numbers has been in the below chart.

look at the figure in details, In 2007 jump the 25 million houslhold.And, the other greator than between 25 to 30 millions.Also, thridly decrease the 20 million and modesty cahnge between 10 to 15 miilion annual income.Because, in 2007 annual income jump directly 25 to 30 millions electricity produce.Additionally, In 2011 escalate 27 to 30 millions numbers of households and also 30 millions its has marginally cahnge.Other, in 2011 just 12 to 14 millions surge.But, its has in this year substainly change 27 million.

Finally,The last year 2015 grow 25 to 30 millions both.In addition, this year number of household 22 millions between other has slightly cahnge, Last, in 2015 sharply increase 30 to 35 millions.

its mean 2015 has been dramatically cahnge in electricity produce.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response responds to the task only minimally and tangentially. While the writer attempts to introduce the chart, the content fails to accurately summarise the main features or make relevant comparisons of US household income data for 2007, 2011, and 2015. Instead of presenting a coherent overview of the visual data, the text includes irrelevant statements about 'electricity produce' and random figures that do not align with the provided chart. Furthermore, some sentences merely repeat parts of the rubric without developing any clear trends. To move to a higher band, the writer must carefully select key data points from the chart, group them logically, and describe actual trends rather than generating unrelated information.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

Information and ideas are not arranged coherently in this response, resulting in a text that lacks a clear overall progression. Although the writer attempts to divide the writing into paragraphs, the internal structure of each paragraph is disorganised and difficult to follow. Sentences such as 'overview, The chart shows that how describe the number of household millions' fail to connect logically to one another, and cohesive devices are used incorrectly or mechanically. Referencing is often unclear, making it hard for the reader to understand which years or income brackets are being discussed. To improve, the writer needs to structure the response with a clear introduction, an overview, and well-organised body paragraphs that use appropriate transitional phrases to guide the reader through the data.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The vocabulary used is basic and repetitive, employing a very limited range of words that are frequently misused. Terms such as 'houslhold', 'cahnge', and 'substainly' display severe spelling and word-form errors that strain the reader's comprehension. In addition, inappropriate phrasing such as 'electricity produce' indicates a lack of control over topic-specific leкса. To reach a higher standard, the writer must build a broader vocabulary suited to describing statistical data, ensuring correct word forms, accurate spelling, and appropriate collocations such as 'increase', 'fluctuate', or 'remain stable' instead of relying on heavily misspelled or confused terms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0

The response demonstrates a very limited range of structures, with frequent grammatical errors that often distort meaning. Simple sentence forms are attempted, but complex structures are either absent or entirely faulty, as seen in fragments like 'look at the figure in details, In 2007 jump the 25 million houslhold.' There are persistent errors in subject-verb agreement, tense usage, missing articles, and prepositions throughout the text. Punctuation is also poorly handled, with commas and capitalisation applied randomly. To achieve a higher band, the writer must focus on basic sentence construction, ensuring that every sentence contains a clear subject and verb, and work on reducing frequent errors that impede clear communication.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.