Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The bar chart illustrats,the amount of daily comodities used in US by their annual income between 2007,2011 and 2015.

Overall,it is clearly shown that the highetst annual income holder has largest income group by 2015. The medium income catagories changed little,whereas the low income household earnings has the most fluctuations throughout the periods.

In 2007, approximately 25 million household earned less than $25,000 annually,while around 27 million fell into $25000 -$49,000 catagory.The figures for households earning $50,000-$74,000 and $75000-$99999 were about 21 milion and 15 million,respectively.Meanwhile, thehighest income group accounted for approximately 30 million households.

By 2011, the number of household earning less than $25000 had risen to around 29 million, while $25000-$49,999 had just almost 30 million.The figures for middle income catagories remained relatively stable,approximately 22 million and 15 million.However, the hightest-income group declined slightly to about 28 million.

in 2015,household earning $[redacted phone] or more rose sharply to approximately 34 million,the highest figure on the chart. The number earning $75000-$99999 showed slight increasing value about $16 million,while other income groups remained broadly stable.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You provide a clear overview of the broad pattern, noting that the highest-income group reached its peak in 2015 and that the middle categories changed little. You also report several relevant figures across all three years. However, some details are inaccurate or unclear: the $50,000–$74,999 group stayed at about 21 million, not 22 million in 2011, and the $75,000–$99,999 group was about 14–15 million, rather than 16 million in 2015. The claim that low-income households had the most fluctuations is not well supported; their figures rose by 2011 and then changed only slightly. More precise comparisons of the main rises and falls would make the summary more complete and better grounded in the chart.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction and overview are followed by paragraphs describing 2007, 2011 and 2015. Time markers such as “In 2007,” “By 2011” and “in 2015” help readers follow the sequence, and contrast words such as “while” and “However” connect comparisons. This organisation is effective, though the year-by-year approach sometimes makes the account feel like a list rather than a comparison of trends across the whole period. For example, the final paragraph says other groups remained stable without specifying which ones or linking this to their earlier figures. Use clearer cross-year comparisons and ensure punctuation after linking expressions to make the progression smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant chart vocabulary, including “accounted for,” “declined slightly,” “rose sharply” and “remained relatively stable,” which helps describe changes. However, the range is uneven, and several word choices are inaccurate or awkward: “daily commodities used” misidentifies what the chart measures, while “highest annual income holder” and “largest income group” do not clearly refer to households in an income bracket. There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “illustrats,” “highetst,” “catagories” and “milion.” These do not prevent the general meaning from being understood, but they reduce precision and polish. Use consistent terms such as “households in the income bracket” and check spelling and income-range labels carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including comparisons joined with “while” and clauses introduced by “whereas.” Most of the intended meaning is understandable, but errors in sentence construction and punctuation recur. For example, “the low income household earnings has the most fluctuations” has a mismatch between the plural subject and singular verb, and “The number earning $75000-$99999 showed slight increasing value” is not grammatically complete in its phrasing. Several sentences also omit spaces after commas or begin with a lowercase letter, as in “in 2015.” Improve subject–verb agreement, use complete noun phrases, and proofread sentence boundaries and punctuation. More consistently accurate complex sentences would strengthen control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.