Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

the given bar chart illutrates the informartion about the number of household purchasing in the USA by their annual income in 2017 ,2011 and 2015.

the number of household ranges five different categories according to annual income , starting from less than 25000 dollors maximum [redacted phone] or more dollors.in the graph thosewho had more than [redacted phone] dollors purchasing showed highest rank while [redacted phone]9 dollars showed lowest rank of purchasing among all categories.

100,000 or more dollors in annualincome showed highest postion,25 billions by 2017 ,more than 25 billion by 2011 and more than 30 billion by [redacted phone]0$ - 99999$ showed lowest rank, around 15 billion by 2007, slight less than 15 billion by 2011 and 15billions by 2015.

less than 25000$ showed 25 million , almost 30 million by 2011 while 27.5 million by year 2015 house hold purchasing.25000$-49999$ incomers showed second highest in the graph slight more 25 millions by 2007 ,30 millions by 2011and slight less than 30 million by year 2015 .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

The response identifies the five income groups and correctly notes that the $75,000–$99,999 group was among the smallest, while households earning $100,000 or more reached the highest level in 2015. However, coverage of the data is incomplete and several figures or years are inaccurate: the opening says 2017 instead of 2007, and the highest-income group is reported as 25 million in 2017, although it was about 29.5 million in 2007. The lower-income group is also given as 27.5 million in 2015 rather than about 28 million. There is no clear overview of the main changes across all categories, and the $50,000–$74,999 group is omitted. Select the key trends accurately and summarise them before giving supporting figures.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has separate paragraphs and generally moves from an introduction to category descriptions, so the reader can recognise an attempt to organise the information. However, the progression is not consistently clear: the second paragraph mixes the chart’s categories with a ranking, and later paragraphs repeat claims about the highest and lowest groups. There is no distinct overview to guide the reader through the main trends, and links between details are limited. Some sentences run together, such as the description beginning “100,000 or more dollors,” which makes comparisons harder to follow. Use a clear sequence—introduction, overview, then grouped comparisons—and connect related figures with precise linking phrases.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The response uses some task-relevant vocabulary, including “categories,” “highest,” “lowest,” and “annual income,” and it attempts to describe comparisons. However, the range is limited and several choices are inaccurate or unnatural, sometimes making the meaning unclear. For example, “household purchasing” does not describe the number of households, and “showed highest rank of purchasing” is an awkward way to report a chart value. Spelling errors such as “illutrates,” “informartion,” and “dollors” are also noticeable. Use standard chart language consistently, such as “the number of households,” “stood at,” and “increased to,” and check spelling and income-band labels.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts some longer sentences and uses basic comparison structures, but grammatical control is weak and errors frequently affect clarity. Examples include “the number of household ranges five different categories,” where the subject and verb do not form a correct sentence, and “thosewho had more than 100000 dollors purchasing showed highest rank,” which lacks a clear grammatical structure. Articles, plurals, and sentence boundaries are also often missing or inconsistent, as in “15billions by 2015.” Most statements follow similar simple patterns, with little accurate variety. Build shorter, complete sentences first, checking subject–verb agreement and singular/plural forms, then add controlled comparisons using structures such as “while” or “whereas.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.