Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Some people believe that History is one of the essential school subjects. While others argue that Science and techology are more important than History. This essay will examine the both views.

Regarding the importance of History, It gives a wide knowledge of background and make our general knowledge strong. I think this subject is essentail and we should teach this course to the students at school. Furthermore, teaching history allow studnets to clear their exam related to history. For instance, in Pakistan most of higher exams give questions related to history or ask to write essay about previous incidences. That why history plays a important role for students to clear their exams or interview.

On the other hand, teaching subjects related to science or technology are very crucial for students. We all know that now a days Ai is replacing humans in offices and make work more easier. In addition, by using AI tools students can learn new skills such as programming, communication and it can also provide free guidance to studnets related to their assignement. Although history provide vast information about previous events, science and technology are also an important subject that allow the pupils to work in a modern world and fix their mistakes by using different tools or technology.

To sum up, History is a good subject its make academic learners mind strong and provide free knowledge to clear their interview or exams, science and technology is also a major subject it makes students to work along with Ai or making their task more flexible by learning how to handle new tools. I think studnets need to learn both subjects as they both are important and play a major role in studnets life.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the discussion and give a clear opinion in the conclusion: students should learn both subjects. The History paragraph offers a relevant example from Pakistan, linking historical questions to exams and interviews, while the technology paragraph explains how AI can support learning and prepare students for modern work. These points keep the response focused on the task. However, some ideas are less fully developed than others: the claim that History strengthens general knowledge is not explained, and the exam example focuses more on passing assessments than on why History matters as a school subject. Develop the educational and wider social value of each subject, and make your comparison and personal position clearer throughout the essay.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Transitions such as “On the other hand,” “Furthermore,” and “To sum up” help readers follow the discussion, and the ideas generally progress within each paragraph. This shows a coherent structure, with some effective linking. To make the progression more polished, avoid relying on formulaic transitions and ensure each paragraph has a clear central point followed by explanation and evidence. The final paragraph combines several claims in long sentences, making the summary less easy to follow. Referencing could also be clearer—for example, specify what “it” refers to in “its make academic learners mind strong,” rather than leaving the reader to infer the subject.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use vocabulary relevant to education and technology, including “general knowledge,” “programming,” “communication,” and “modern world,” so the main ideas are understandable. However, the range is limited and several expressions are imprecise or unnatural, such as “clear their exam,” “previous incidences,” and “make work more easier.” Repetition of “important,” “subject,” and “students” also restricts flexibility. Spelling errors, including “techology,” “essentail,” and “assignement,” are noticeable and reduce accuracy. Aim to use more precise academic collocations and check spelling carefully. For example, describe students as “pass examinations,” refer to “historical events,” and say technology can “make tasks more efficient.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mixture of simple and more complex forms, including the contrast introduced by “Although history provide vast information…” and the relative clause “tools students can learn new skills.” The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but some grammatical errors occur across the response. Examples include subject–verb agreement in “teaching history allow” and “history provide,” article use in “a important role,” and sentence construction in the opening fragment, “While others argue that…”. The conclusion also contains a run-on structure joining several ideas with commas. Practise checking agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries, and vary sentence patterns while keeping each sentence controlled. These changes would make your argument clearer and more accurate.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.