Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In today's world people is devided between history and science as the most important subject in school, and that makes sense making history is the most studied subject since school have been a thing people knows history as they know their names people have been growing with it and living it even the people who have never been to school they know history as part of their life and in the other hand we can say the same for science and technologies, other people wants to discover new things, want to create something new something can help humanity and help us in our daily basis, and as someone who is studying engeering i can tell that the future now depends on the technologies and science and not history, yes we can learn from the past yes we need history to not repeate the mistakes that happened before, but now the world need innovation the world needs technologies in every field, médecins, robots that's what the future is all about we can't hold in the past only we need see the bright future that's waiting for us.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You present both perspectives: history is described as part of people’s lives, while science and technology are linked to discovery and practical help. Your own view is also apparent in “the future now depends on the technologies and science and not history,” and you acknowledge history’s value in learning from past mistakes. However, the discussion is brief and the supporting ideas are mostly asserted rather than explained or illustrated. The response also contains 186 words, so it does not meet the required minimum of 250 words. Develop each side with a specific reason and example, then explain more fully why you believe innovation deserves greater emphasis while history remains valuable.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response follows a recognisable line of thought: it introduces the two subjects, gives reasons for valuing each, and ends by favouring science and technology. Linking expressions such as “on the other hand” and “yes” help signal contrast and concession. However, almost the entire essay is one long sentence, so the reader has to work to identify where one idea ends and another begins. Some links are also unclear, particularly “and that makes sense making history…” Break the response into paragraphs for the two views and your opinion, and use full stops to separate supporting points. Clearer sequencing would make the argument easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “discover,” “innovation,” “technologies,” “humanity,” and “mistakes,” and these choices make your main ideas understandable. There is some attempt to use topic-specific language, such as “engineering” and “robots.” However, the range is limited and several expressions are inaccurate or unnatural, including “daily basis,” “hold in the past,” and “the world need innovation.” Spelling errors such as “devided,” “engeering,” and “repeate” are noticeable and reduce precision. Aim for more accurate collocations and check spelling carefully; for example, describe technology as helping “in everyday life” and say that society should not “remain focused only on the past.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt to connect ideas using longer structures, including a contrast between learning from the past and pursuing innovation. This shows an effort to express relationships between ideas, but the response relies heavily on one extended sentence, and complex structures are often faulty. For example, “people is devided” has subject–verb disagreement, while “school have been a thing” and “people knows” also contain agreement errors. Missing or incorrect articles and sentence boundaries further affect clarity. Use a mix of shorter, complete sentences and carefully controlled complex sentences. Check agreement, such as “people are” and “schools have,” and punctuate each main idea with a full stop.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.