Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Some individuals argue that History is one of the most significant subjects in the school curriculum,while other argue that Science and Technology recieve higher recognition than History. Being a student of science, I am of the notion that Science and Technology should be given preference over History, as these subjects prepare young children to invent or discover things that are beneficial in the long run in this ever changing modern world and would gteach them to apply skillls at the time of need.

It could be argued that History needs to be taught to school children inorder to bring awareness among them, about the freedom struggles our ancesters fought inorder to make our nation independant and free of colonisation.By learning this, children understand the

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You establish a relevant opinion in the opening, stating that Science and Technology should receive preference, and you begin to explain the opposing view by referring to children learning about freedom struggles and independence. However, the response addresses the task only minimally: the discussion of History stops mid-sentence at “children understand the,” and the reasons for prioritising Science and Technology are asserted rather than explained or supported with an example. The comparison between the two views is therefore incomplete, and your own position is not developed beyond the introduction. The response also does not meet the required minimum length, leaving too little space to develop both sides. To improve, complete each argument, explain its consequences, and include a relevant example before concluding clearly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The opening introduces both sides of the debate and gives your position, so the reader can identify the intended direction. You also begin a separate paragraph for the case for teaching History. However, the response ends abruptly in the middle of an idea, and there is no completed progression from the two viewpoints to a conclusion. The link between the claim that science prepares children to invent and the further claim about applying skills is not fully explained. Some linking is attempted through “while” and “By learning this,” but the latter has no completed follow-up. Develop a clear paragraph for each view, use references that point to complete ideas, and finish with a conclusion that restates your judgement.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You show some range beyond basic vocabulary, using phrases such as “school curriculum,” “freedom struggles,” “independence,” and “colonisation” to discuss the topic. The meaning is generally understandable, but several word choices and spelling errors reduce precision, including “higher recognition” where “greater importance” would be more natural, and “ancesters” and “independant.” “Apply skills at the time of need” is also an awkward collocation. The response is too brief to demonstrate a consistently broad range, and some phrasing is repetitive, particularly the repeated use of “inorder.” Aim for accurate spelling and natural academic collocations, and choose precise terms to explain how historical knowledge or scientific study benefits students.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a complex opening sentence that contrasts the two positions and includes a subordinate clause explaining your view. This shows some ability to use more than simple sentence patterns. However, control is uneven: “other argue” has a subject–verb agreement error, and the long sentence beginning “Being a student of science” becomes difficult to follow because several ideas are joined together. The final sentence is incomplete, ending with “children understand the,” so its meaning cannot be fully conveyed. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing spaces after commas and a full stop needed after “colonisation.” Use shorter, complete sentences to develop each reason, check agreement and punctuation, and ensure every paragraph ends with a finished thought.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.