Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In recent year this topic is in debate list everywhere. Many people says that History is most important school subject while other believe in modern era Science and technology are more important than history. Both sides are right to some extent and every picture has two sides.

Those who think History is one of the most important subject are genuinely right because it is very crucial for our younger generations to know about our history,culture and heroes who sacrifices their own life for the betterment of society . If we abandon history our younger generations will automatically lose cultural heritage and cultural identity. For instance one of my friend get admitted to a High School in city in which there is no history class and know he did not know anything about history and our heroes which is very disappointing.

Moreover, those who thinks science and technology related subjects are more essential are not wrong at all because this is modern era and everyone is in the race of being technologically advanced and superior which is not possible without strong base in science subjects.All of our modern inventions whatever it is AI or advanced medicine it is only became possible due to science. If we start neglecting science we will be far behind in technology race.In addition, If we want to become successful as a nation it is not possible to leave neither history nor science.

From my prospective emitting one subject for other is not a good option we has to take these subjects side my side but our main focus will be tend towards the science subjects due to their more practical need with weekend lectures of history to took benefits from both subjects.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response discusses both perspectives and gives a clear personal view: history matters for cultural identity, while science and technology have practical value, and both should remain in the curriculum. The examples about a friend attending a school without history lessons and modern inventions such as AI and medicine are relevant. However, the history argument is developed more through assertion than explanation, and the personal example is brief; the science paragraph also makes broad claims without showing in detail how these subjects benefit students or society. The conclusion states that science should receive greater focus, but this preference could be explained more fully and reconciled more clearly with the call to teach both subjects.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs presenting the two views, and a concluding opinion. Linking expressions such as “Moreover,” “For instance,” and “In addition” help signal relationships between ideas. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. The opening phrase “every picture has two sides” adds little to the argument, while “In addition” introduces a conclusion-like point within the science paragraph. The final sentence combines several ideas—teaching both subjects, prioritising science, and offering history lectures—without clearly showing how they fit together. Improve progression by making each paragraph’s main point explicit and using references and transitions that clarify the relationship between claims and examples.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The response uses a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “cultural heritage,” “cultural identity,” “technologically advanced,” “modern inventions,” and “practical need.” These choices help communicate the main ideas, and the meaning is generally understandable. However, several word-choice and collocation errors make the expression less natural, such as “in debate list everywhere,” “race of being technologically advanced,” and “weekend lectures of history.” Some wording is also repetitive, particularly the repeated references to “subjects” and “science.” Aim for more precise, natural academic phrasing and check spelling and word forms, for example “perspective” rather than “prospective” and “emitting” where “replacing” or “neglecting” appears intended.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

There are attempts to use both simple and complex structures, including conditional sentences such as “If we abandon history…” and “If we start neglecting science…”. The main ideas can usually be followed, but some grammatical errors recur across the response. These include subject–verb agreement (“Many people says,” “those who thinks”), article and plural errors (“one of the most important subject”), and faulty verb forms (“it is only became possible”). The final sentence also has several structural problems, including “we has to take” and “to took,” which make the conclusion harder to process. Improve control of agreement, verb forms, and sentence boundaries, then proofread each sentence for a clear subject and correctly formed verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.