Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is often argue that history is one of the most important subject in school education. whereas, some other community members believe that science and technology are more importnat than history. Although both subjects are very crucial for their education. In my opinion, students should give equal importance to both subjects becuase they provide different benefits.

On the one hand, some believe that studying history helps a lot to students to learn about the country's past, cultures and traditions. By studying historical events students can acquire knowledge about mistakes and acheivements of previous generations. For instance, when students elarn about major wars they comes to know how society develop overtime. By studying hoistory they learn critical thinking skills and also develop the sense of love and more respect for their nation.

On the other hand, many people believe that science subject are very crucial in this rapidly developing world. This is because modern societies increasingly depends on scientific discoveries and technological advancement. They argue that in this modern era subjects like biology, chemistry, physics and computer science palys an insurmountable role in success of individiuals are also beneficial for the society as whole. For instance, by studying medical subjects they can do more research on carious uncure disease .

In conclusion, some people believe that history is most important subject in school education while other argue that science and technology are very crucial in this rapidly developing world. In mu opinion, students should give equal importance to both subjects beause they give different benefits.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear opinion: “students should give equal importance to both subjects.” The history paragraph gives relevant reasons, including learning from past mistakes and developing respect for one’s nation; the science paragraph also explains its value through research into disease. These points answer the task, but some are asserted rather than fully explained. For example, the claim that history develops critical thinking is not illustrated, and the science example ends without showing how research benefits society. Your conclusion repeats your position but does not add a final reason. Develop each main point with a clearer explanation or a specific example to make the response more fully supported.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each viewpoint, and a conclusion. The signposts “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” make the progression easy to follow, and the central opinion is consistent. This meets the lower-band expectations and shows some features of stronger organisation. However, cohesion is occasionally mechanical, with repeated references to “studying” and “subjects,” and the opening sentence beginning “Although both subjects…” is a fragment that interrupts the flow. Some links between claims could also be clearer—for instance, explain how learning about wars leads to understanding social development. Use more varied referencing and connect each example explicitly to its point.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “historical events,” “previous generations,” “scientific discoveries,” and “technological advancement.” These choices show an attempt to discuss both subjects beyond very basic terms. However, the range and control are uneven: several spelling errors (“acheivements,” “hoistory,” “individ iuals”) and inaccurate or unnatural combinations (“helps a lot to students,” “love and more respect”) make the writing less precise. “Insurmountable role” is also an unsuitable collocation in this context. Aim for accurate, natural academic phrasing rather than choosing an ambitious word that does not fit. Proofreading spelling and checking common word partnerships would make your ideas clearer and more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a concession in the introduction and a reason clause beginning “This is because.” Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make sentences difficult to follow. For example, “It is often argue” needs a passive form, while “science subject are” and “societies increasingly depends” show agreement problems. The sentence beginning “Although both subjects…” is incomplete, and “they comes to know” has an incorrect verb form. There are also problems with articles and sentence boundaries. Practise checking subject–verb agreement, complete clauses, and verb forms, then proofread each sentence while preserving your attempts at complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.