Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Whether History or Science and technology are important subjects is a widely debated issue especially in modern societies of today. Both these subjects have their own educational and social implications. I think considering present era of modernisation of the world sceintific knowlege is of prime importance for developing skills and knowledge, whereas histoty should be taught also for understanding the roots of society for young generations in school.

On the one hand, proponents of science subject support the importance of scientific knowledge learning as a compulsory subject for all students in school. This is because of the fact we are living in a world of technology. Modern scientific inventions and computers have invaded all aspects of our lives. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence has also emerged as a tool to assist humanity. For example we are depended on our mobile phones and internet services for all our house chores and office work. Without a proper baseline technological knowledge it would be impossible to cope with future demand at work and home. So advocates of scientific learning presses upon gaining scientific knowledge at school rather than wasting a lot of time on learninh old history.

On the other hand, critics of this view believe that teaching and learning are most important subjects at school level. They argue that without studying about acheivement of our ancestors children cannot develop bounding with their society and cultural background. Moreover, history subjects and studying role models in school help children develop certain moral values in life which can ultimately benefit society.

In conclusion, I think schools curriculum should include both sceience and history subjects. I suggest to priortise gaining science study over history as learning science subject is more challenging and need more hardwork and commitment for students.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both perspectives and state a clear position: science and technology should receive priority, while history remains important for understanding society’s roots. The science paragraph gives relevant reasons, including technology’s role in daily life and future work, and the mobile-phone example helps illustrate this. The history paragraph also identifies cultural connection and moral learning as benefits. However, these points are less fully explained than the case for science; for instance, the claim that studying role models develops moral values would benefit from a specific example or explanation. Your conclusion introduces the idea that science is more challenging, but this reason is not developed in the body. Develop both sides more evenly and support the final justification to make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. The signposts “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” make the progression easy to follow, and ideas within the science paragraph generally move from technology’s importance to its practical consequences. This meets the lower-band expectations securely and shows some effective organisation. To make the progression more consistently smooth, clarify the opening of the history paragraph: “critics of this view believe that teaching and learning are most important subjects” does not clearly identify history as the subject being discussed. Some links, such as “Meanwhile” and “So,” feel mechanical or imprecise; use transitions that express the exact relationship between ideas, and connect the conclusion’s new point to the preceding discussion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “artificial intelligence,” “cultural background,” “scientific knowledge,” and “moral values,” which helps communicate the main ideas. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “educational and social implications.” However, noticeable spelling errors and inaccurate or unnatural word combinations reduce precision: examples include “sceintific knowlege,” “histoty,” “invaded all aspects,” and “presses upon gaining.” Some expressions are also vague or awkward, such as “house chores” and “bounding with their society.” These choices do not prevent the reader from understanding the argument, but they limit the control and flexibility of the vocabulary. Check spelling carefully and learn common collocations in context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including a contrastive opening (“Whether History or Science and technology…”) and a conditional sentence beginning “Without a proper baseline technological knowledge…”. Most ideas remain understandable, and the paragraph structure gives you opportunities to vary sentence forms. Some grammatical errors nevertheless appear in sentence construction and agreement. For example, “This is because of the fact we are living” needs a clearer clause structure, while “advocates … presses” has a subject–verb agreement problem. In “I suggest to priortise,” the verb pattern is not grammatical, and “schools curriculum” needs a possessive form. Review these patterns and punctuation around introductory phrases, then proofread each sentence for agreement and complete clause structure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.