Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is often argue that history is one of the major school subjects. whereas other people disagree that in todays modern era subjects like science and technology are more important than history. Although both the presceptive have their own merits. In this essay my both views and opinion are discussed below.

On the one hand , propnents of history as crucial school subjects argues that in modern era subjects such as; science and technology should be more important aspect than history .This is primary because by learning the history helps students to learn about the sacrifice made by our ancestors. This is largely due to they fought for us to give the freedom who dominates our country, which ultimately leads to they value and respect their sacrifice which they made for the community. For instance, teenagers who read books about history have more knowledge compare to have a normal indiviual. Consequently, this presceptive can be considered benifical, particularly in terms of specialization of subject.

On the other hand, I strongly believe that it should be considered as major part in their learning history is more convincing. Whereas, presceptive of other says that science and technology should be more focused subjects then history. This is largely due to modernization in urban countries which can ultimately leads to develop the interest of learning science. For instance, nowdays many students are scoring good marks rather then history. Therfore I would argue that history has a major role otherwise it would be vanished and nobody can learn about the things that should be proud of.

Extracting the gist, from the above conclusion I firmly believe that history should give an equal value as much given to science and technology.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response attempts to discuss both views and gives a position, especially in the final sentence, where you argue that history should receive equal value to science and technology. However, the discussion is only partially effective because the views are not clearly distinguished or consistently explained. The first body paragraph says supporters of history believe science and technology should be more important, which reverses the stated viewpoint. The examples about students’ marks and historical reading are also asserted rather than explained, so the reader cannot see how they support the argument. Develop each side accurately, give a clear reason for its importance, and use a specific example to support your own balanced opinion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is a basic essay structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a concluding statement, and phrases such as “On the one hand” and “On the other hand” signal a change of viewpoint. However, progression within the paragraphs is difficult to follow because ideas are sometimes contradictory or loosely connected. For example, the first paragraph introduces history as crucial but then claims science and technology should be more important. Several linking expressions, including “This is largely due to” and “Consequently,” do not make the relationship between the claims clear. The conclusion also begins awkwardly with “Extracting the gist.” Organise each paragraph around one clearly stated view, then connect its reason and example directly.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “ancestors,” “modernization,” “specialization,” and “sacrifice,” and you attempt a range of expressions to discuss importance and consequences. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation and spelling errors make parts of the argument difficult to understand. Examples include “both the presceptive,” “a normal indiviual,” “benifical,” and “history has a major role otherwise it would be vanished.” Some phrases appear memorised or are used inaccurately, such as “Extracting the gist.” Choose simpler, precise wording when unsure, and check spelling and natural combinations of words. This will make your ideas clearer and more convincing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts complex sentences using clauses such as “which ultimately leads to” and “which can ultimately leads to,” but these structures are often faulty. Errors in verb forms and agreement occur throughout: “It is often argue” should be “It is often argued,” “subjects … argues” should be “subjects … argue,” and “can … leads” should be “can … lead.” Sentence boundaries and punctuation are also inconsistent, as in “Although both the presceptive have their own merits. In this essay…” where the opening dependent clause is left as a fragment. These frequent errors sometimes make relationships between ideas hard to follow. Practise accurate simple sentences first, then add subordinate clauses and check agreement, articles and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.