Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-12
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Many people belived that history is essential as a subject in school while other argue that Science and technology are more important than History. This essay will discuss both perspectives before articulating my own stance.
History is imporatnt for learners as knowing the history of past generation many can learn from the mistakes of the past generations. Studying regarding the facts how their country or nations struggle in the past also develop nationalism and patriotism in today's generation.For example studying about world war II tell us how important it is democracy. Studying history also give knowledge abput national heros for example when i were studying regarding Allama Iqbal in school and how he give idea regarding separate state for different community I also got introduced with his work and poetry.
As science and technology is evolving day by day it is also important for students to evolve in science. Not learning regarding science will impact the economy but results in poor advancement of society. For example countries like USA, Germany and China are growing because of their advancement in science and technology. They are teaching science and technology in their schools and generating a bulge of doctors, engineers and scientist. In comparision with the underdeveloped countries that are underdeveloped because they are not focusing on technology not teaching their new generation regarding the advancement of science.
I believe that both science along with history are important for students. Both subjects should be make a part of curriculum as history is essential for the understanding of the nation and science is important for the development of the nation.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear position: “both science along with history are important for students.” The history paragraph gives relevant support through learning from past mistakes, patriotism, and the example of Allama Iqbal; the science paragraph also explains its connection to economic and social development. This meets the task well, with some elements showing the fuller development expected at the next level. However, several claims remain broad—for example, that countries are growing because of scientific advancement—and the link between studying World War II and the importance of democracy needs clearer explanation. Develop these points with a specific consequence or example, and explain more directly how the two subjects can complement each other.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a concluding opinion. This makes the discussion easy to follow. You also use signposting such as “For example” and “I believe,” and the main ideas generally progress in a logical order. At times, however, connections between sentences are mechanical or unclear. The transition from the claim about science’s effect on the economy to “but results in poor advancement” is difficult to follow, and the final sentence repeats the idea that both subjects are important without adding much. Use linking expressions to show cause and contrast precisely, and make sure pronouns and references clearly point to the intended idea.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “nationalism and patriotism,” “advancement,” “curriculum,” and “underdeveloped countries.” These choices allow you to discuss both historical and scientific education, and the meaning is generally understandable. However, the range and control are uneven: some phrases are repetitive or imprecise, such as “studying regarding” and “advancement of science,” while spelling errors including “belived,” “imporatnt,” and “comparision” are noticeable. Some word forms and collocations also sound unnatural, for example “a bulge of doctors” and “national heros.” Build a more accurate range of topic-specific collocations and check spelling and word forms carefully; this will make your ideas clearer and more fluent.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a subordinate clause in “as knowing the history … many can learn” and a contrast between the two subjects. The overall meaning can usually be understood, but errors in sentence construction, agreement, verb forms, and punctuation occur often enough to affect clarity. For example, “Studying history also give knowledge” needs subject–verb agreement, while “Both subjects should be make a part” has an incorrect verb pattern. The sentence beginning “Not learning regarding science will impact the economy but results…” is also structurally unclear. Practise building accurate clauses first, then combine them; check agreement, tense, articles, and sentence boundaries during revision.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.