Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

A fraction of individuals tells that History is one of the most beneficial educational institution unit while other persons say that in current globe units like science and technology are more beneficial than History.In my view, technology and science are important subjects in today's world because it help student to be creative and innovative.

To begin with, science and technology are important subjects in the current world in that it fosters creativity and innovation among learners. Science and technolgy are core units in the modern world as they deal with the practical and basic knowledge skills.Teaching learners science and technology in learning institution aid them in acquiring common skills such as observation,experimenting and listening also taking students to laboroties in schools help them apply knowledge learned in class into a practice.As learnes apply these skill they even go further into solving problems that they encounter in dad to day life. For instance, most of the educational institution have made science and technology a compalsory unit as research conducted country wide shows that science student solve basic challenges they encounted with ease

On the contrary,history plays an important role in school as it aids in explaining the origin of certein scientific theries thus helping the learners understand cocepts very well.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You state a clear preference for science and technology, explaining that they can foster creativity, teach practical skills and help students solve everyday problems. You also acknowledge History’s value by saying it can explain the origins of scientific theories. However, the response addresses the task only partially: the History viewpoint receives just one brief sentence, with no example or developed explanation, and the example supporting science is vague (“research conducted country wide”) rather than specific. The response is also below the required 250 words, which limits the opportunity to discuss both views and support your opinion. To strengthen the response, develop the case for History, give a concrete example for each side, and explain why your preferred subjects matter more in your view.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic overall structure: an opening introduces both positions and your opinion, a main paragraph develops science and technology, and “On the contrary” signals the shift to History. This gives the reader some sense of organisation. However, the discussion does not progress evenly because the second viewpoint is reduced to a single sentence, and the science paragraph contains several ideas joined together without clear separation. Some links are awkward or unclear, such as “in that it fosters” and “also taking students to laboratories.” Use separate paragraphs for the two views, connect each supporting point explicitly to the main idea, and add a concluding paragraph that restates your position. This would make the progression clearer and cohesion less dependent on a few linking phrases.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt topic-related vocabulary, including “creativity,” “innovation,” “practical,” “observation” and “solving problems,” which helps communicate the general argument. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, sometimes making the reader pause. For example, “educational institution unit” is not a natural way to describe a school subject, and “current globe” is an unsuitable expression for today’s world. There are also spelling errors such as “technolgy,” “laboroties” and “compalsory.” Aim for accurate, natural academic phrases and check spelling carefully. More precise vocabulary would help you explain the distinct value of historical study as well as the practical benefits of science.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including a reason clause (“because it help student…”) and a sentence explaining how practical activities may support learning. The main ideas are generally understandable, but errors in agreement, articles, plurals and sentence boundaries occur. For example, “it help student” should use a plural subject and matching verb, while “Teaching learners science and technology … aid them” also has a subject–verb agreement problem. Several sentences run together, particularly the opening and the long sentence beginning “Teaching learners…,” and punctuation is inconsistent. Practise building accurate complex sentences with clear clause boundaries, and check agreement and articles during revision. Greater control would make your reasoning easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.