Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowadays, there is considerable debate about whether History is the most essential or Science and Technology are more important in school's syllabus. According to me, both are equally important and so in this essay, I will shed light on both viwes and discuss the reasons behind this with adequate examples.

To begin with, many individuals believe that History must be included in todays school syllabys as students must know about past history, lifestyle of ancestors, traditions, activities,cultures, heritage buildings. For instance, Young generation should acqire knowledge from past and they will be alart to not doing wrong in present and future as well. In addition it protects the youngsters from repeated crime. Moreover it helps the students to lead the research works based on the observing of pros and cons of any previous facts.

On the otherhand, Some people thinks that Science and modern Technology are the most importnt for achieving Knowledge of the pupils. As the saying goes, " Technology is a powerful tool that can transform our lives if we use it wisely". The real fact is that Science is present everywhere. Moreover, in our education system, Science must be endorsed so that students can apply its advent in their professional and daly life activities in future. For example, science students will be the future researcher and invention of new weapons, medicines , instruments, equipments depend on their hard work.

In my opinion, the selection of the subjects for the students must strike a balance between History and science- Technology.

In conclusion, History helps to broaden pupil's horizons whereas, Science and Technology are essential for the future invention in terms of medical , Engineering, weapons etc,

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear position: “both are equally important,” reinforced by your conclusion that the curriculum should balance them. The historical perspective includes relevant points about learning from past mistakes and informing research, while the science paragraph connects the subject to future work and inventions. However, several ideas remain broad or unclear. For example, “it protects the youngsters from repeated crime” does not explain how studying history achieves this, and the list of future inventions is not developed with a specific example. The response therefore covers the task, but the reasons and supporting examples are unevenly explained. To strengthen it, clarify the link between each subject and its benefits, and extend one or two examples in more detail.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph for each viewpoint, your opinion, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “To begin with,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the discussion. However, some connections feel mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “Moreover,” and the separate opinion paragraph is very brief rather than being integrated into the discussion. The final sentence also introduces a contrast without clearly linking it to your stated view that the subjects are equally important. Within paragraphs, ideas sometimes appear as lists, such as the sequence of historical topics, rather than progressing through explanation and evidence. Use fewer repeated transitions and make the relationship between each claim, explanation, and example more explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “heritage buildings,” “traditions,” “professional,” and “research,” and you attempt more formal expressions such as “shed light on” and “strike a balance.” However, inaccurate word choice, collocation, and spelling are noticeable and sometimes make meaning less clear. For example, “past history” is redundant, “apply its advent” is not a natural way to describe using scientific advances, and “future researcher and invention” does not express the intended meaning clearly. There are also spelling errors such as “viwes,” “syllabys,” and “importnt.” Aim for precise, natural combinations and check spelling carefully. Replacing broad or awkward phrases with specific expressions will make your arguments clearer and more academic.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional structure in the quotation and a purpose clause beginning “so that.” Most of the main ideas remain understandable, but errors in sentence construction, agreement, articles, and punctuation recur. For example, “many individuals believe that History must be included … as students must know” makes the relationship between the clauses awkward, while “Some people thinks” has a subject–verb agreement error. The sentence beginning “For example, science students…” is also difficult to follow because its grammatical structure does not clearly connect the students, research, and inventions. Review agreement and sentence boundaries, and build longer sentences around one clear main clause. More accurate control of these patterns would make your varied sentence attempts easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.