Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-08-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

An observation has been made in current scenario, Role of history Historical stories and knowledge in modern period. It is debatable issue whether Historic subject is crucial or the scientific or technology are much necessary for the learners. In the upcoming paragraphs, I shall analyze both points of view and reveal my own opinion.

Some pupils hold the view that chronicle subjects was much crucial for the scholars subject schedule. Firstly, looking to the medieval knowledge. It gives the information about the past stories and our folks achievement. To explain it, history has the information about the great kingdom achievement in wars which gives us motivation and confidence for tackling the various obstacles. Secondly, the past time book prints led to tell us about the various protest held in, would for various kinds of purpose. To elaborate it, there was information about protest held for our freedom and personal authorities of our nation.

Others are of the perception that research-based subject was much more beneficial and crucial for the scholars. To begin with, scientific systematic subject tell about the proper reason and cause of the daily life common activities. To elaborate it, technology provides the accurate and evidential proof of activities. For example, Moreover, it is more beneficial for the bright future of the youngst youngsters.

From the above analysis, I personally believe that the past knowledge and technology information both are was crucial for the learners for the experience. Nevertheless, scientific and technology information was much imperative for scholars mind information.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses both views and provides a personal opinion, meeting the basic requirements of the prompt. However, the development of ideas is limited. For example, the arguments regarding history are vague, mentioning 'great kingdom achievement' without specific context, and the points on science are similarly underdeveloped. The conclusion attempts to balance both views but lacks depth. To reach a higher band, you need to provide more specific, well-supported examples and ensure that your arguments are fully extended rather than just stated. The position is clear, but the supporting evidence is insufficient to fully explore the complexities of the topic.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. Phrases like 'To explain it' and 'To elaborate it' are used repetitively, and some transitions, such as 'looking to the medieval knowledge', are awkward and do not effectively link ideas. Referencing is sometimes unclear, making the progression of arguments feel disjointed. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring that each sentence flows logically from the previous one would significantly improve the coherence of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The range of vocabulary is limited and often imprecise. You frequently use word forms incorrectly, such as 'chronicle subjects' instead of 'historical subjects' and 'personal authorities' instead of 'individual rights'. There are also issues with word choice, such as 'book prints' and 'scholars mind information', which sound unnatural. While the meaning is generally conveyed, the lack of precision and the reliance on basic or incorrectly used vocabulary prevent the essay from achieving a higher score. Expanding your vocabulary to include more academic collocations and ensuring correct word forms is essential.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. There are consistent issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'scientific systematic subject tell about') and tense usage (e.g., 'technology information was much imperative'). Sentence structures are often simple or fragmented, and there is a lack of complex sentence variety. Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the use of commas and sentence boundaries. To improve, focus on mastering basic sentence construction, ensuring subject-verb agreement, and practicing the correct use of tenses in an academic context.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.