Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-08-25
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Some people believed that History is one of the most important school subjects. And other argue that nowadays studying science and technology are more important then studying history. This essay will discuss both views, although I believe that studying history is more beneficial.
On one hand, reading history plays a very crucial role in our life. Gaining knowledge about the past from different things such as; societies, buildings, cultures, ancient civilizations gives mysterious ideas. For example, learning about ancient times opens mind in terms of different aspects. People gets a descriptive idea about their past and previous mistakes so at the present time they don’t repeat and evolve themselves towards success.
On the other hand, science and technology changed our lifestyle at the premium level. the technological upgrades in different fields boost the process to the next level. For example, studying technology at medical professions promote the advance machines which are easy to use and perform difficult tasks in seconds. Studying technology at agricultural field, promote the yield for the community which directly boost our economy to the peak level. therefore studying science and technology builds the future.
To sum up, in my opinion students need to balance both the history and science subject because studying history subject gives us an opportunity to know about our past and improved today’s. and getting rear technical skills from ancient people is natural and transform our present. While learning and implementing science, technology in vast variety of fields enhance our upcoming future. Therefore, I believed that combination of both subjects is the most effective approach.
Give me band score
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat inconsistent. While the arguments for history are present, they are slightly vague, using phrases like 'mysterious ideas' which lack academic precision. The discussion on science and technology is more concrete, though it relies on repetitive structures. Crucially, the conclusion contradicts the introduction; the introduction states a preference for history, while the conclusion argues for a balance. This inconsistency weakens the overall position. To reach a higher band, ensure that the main arguments are fully extended and that the personal position remains consistent throughout the entire response.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is organised into clear paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'On one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'To sum up', which provide a logical framework. However, some transitions are mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'getting rear technical skills from ancient people'. Additionally, the referencing is sometimes unclear, and the flow between sentences within paragraphs could be smoother. The paragraphing is appropriate, but the logical progression is occasionally hindered by the shift in the writer's opinion between the introduction and the conclusion.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but it lacks the precision and sophistication required for higher bands. There are several instances of awkward word choices or collocations, such as 'changed our lifestyle at the premium level' and 'getting rear technical skills'. The use of 'promote the advance machines' is also non-standard. While the student attempts to use a variety of topic-related vocabulary, the lack of control over these terms limits the score. To improve, focus on learning collocations and using more precise academic terminology rather than relying on general descriptors.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede the flow of reading. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ('People gets', 'studying history subject gives us an opportunity'), incorrect verb tenses ('improved today’s'), and punctuation errors (the semicolon usage after 'such as' is incorrect). While the meaning is generally clear, the frequency of these errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. Focusing on basic subject-verb agreement and consistent tense usage would significantly improve the clarity and accuracy of the writing.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.