Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In this cut throat contemporary era, science and history both plays an important role in humans life . Considering this, many people firmly believe that history is important subject while other think science and technology are more important. In this essay i will discuss both views in the forthcoming paragraph with logical conclusion.
To commence with there are myriad of reasons why history should teach in schools? First and foremost teaching history in schools students can know more about the legend of past who invent or sacrifice themselves for upcoming generation. To elucidate, students can learn about freedom fighters who sacrifice themselves for freedom. To cite an example, in the study of West London University they found 90% of students get knowledge in schools. Moreover, people can learn from past mistakes which they can avoid in future. They can get knowledge from the scriptures which were written by our anccestors and people can implement in a daily lives .
On the other hand , people think science and technology are most important to study . One of the worth considering point is that in this modern era science is every thing to understand the artificial intelligence . Most of the jobs are given to the person who has a more knowledge about science and technology as compare to history . Furthermore , science is a practical subject that most of the students are keen to know about technology which is really help them in their profession life .
agulating the aforementioned into conscience it could projected that history is important for onl
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses both views and provides an opinion, though the conclusion is incomplete and cut off. The ideas are relevant, such as the importance of learning from past mistakes and the practical utility of science in the job market. However, the development is somewhat superficial. For example, the reference to a 'West London University' study is vague and lacks a clear connection to the argument. To improve, you should ensure your position is clearly stated in the introduction and consistently maintained throughout, and ensure the essay is fully completed to provide a balanced discussion.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay uses basic cohesive devices like 'To commence with', 'Moreover', and 'On the other hand' to signal transitions between paragraphs. However, the progression of ideas is sometimes mechanical, and the referencing is occasionally unclear. Paragraphing is present, but the final paragraph is abruptly terminated, which disrupts the overall coherence of the piece. To reach a higher band, focus on using a wider variety of linking words and ensure that each paragraph flows logically into the next, leading to a fully developed and coherent conclusion.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks sophistication. You use some repetitive phrasing, such as 'important' and 'knowledge'. There are also spelling errors like 'anccestors' and 'agulating' (likely meant 'aggregating'). While the meaning is generally clear, the range of vocabulary is limited, and there is little evidence of less common lexical items or precise collocations. To improve, try to incorporate more academic vocabulary and synonyms to avoid repetition and enhance the precision of your arguments.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ('science and history both plays'), missing articles ('should teach in schools' instead of 'should be taught'), and awkward phrasing ('as compare to history'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with unnecessary spaces before commas. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to lower the score. Focus on proofreading for basic subject-verb agreement and article usage to improve accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.