Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-13
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
It is often argued that history is one of the most important subjects in school curricula, whereas others believe that science subjects hold significantly more value for students. While I accept that learning history helps young people understand their cultural heritage, I believe that studying science is more essential because it equips learners with vital practical problem-solving skills.
While studying history gives young people useful knowledge about past events, its primary benefit is helping them connect with their cultural roots. Since learning about national history broadens a student's view of the world, it builds a deep interest in preserving traditional values across generations. Traditional history classes often focus on remembering old historical facts, whereas interactive cultural projects encourage students to actively protect their community heritage. Because participating in local historical activities builds genuine pride in traditional customs, students willingly join community events, and society successfully maintains its unique identity over time.
If schools focus more resources on science and technology subjects, students will develop the essential logical thinking skills needed for modern careers. Science education involves hands-on laboratory experiments, which means that learners analyze difficult real-world challenges by using empirical facts rather than simple memorization. Despite the undeniable cultural importance of historical knowledge, learning about past events provides fewer practical skills for solving contemporary issues in everyday life. For instance, when high school teachers combine theoretical scientific concepts with interactive experiments, students learn how to test hypotheses critically and solve complex problems easily.
In conclusion, although history offers clear cultural benefits and broadens general knowledge, studying science is far more useful for a student's personal and professional future. Therefore, educational authorities should prioritize scientific subjects in modern school programs to prepare students for future challenges.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.5 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The student addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views—the importance of history for cultural heritage and science/technology for practical problem-solving—and clearly states a personal position in the introduction and conclusion. Ideas are extended and supported effectively, such as explaining how science education uses hands-on experiments to tackle real-world challenges. While the arguments are well-developed, there is a slight tendency to over-generalize regarding how history classes operate. Overall, the response meets the criteria for Band 7, as it presents a clear position throughout with well-supported ideas.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The essay demonstrates a clear logical organization and progression throughout. Each paragraph has a distinct central topic, starting with the introduction of both views, moving to the discussion of history, then science and technology, and concluding effectively. Cohesive devices are used appropriately, such as 'While I accept', 'Furthermore', and 'In conclusion', though some transition phrases could be more varied. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and appropriately, ensuring the reader can easily follow the progression of ideas from one argument to the next, aligning comfortably with a Band 7 descriptor.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.5
The student uses a sufficient range of vocabulary with some flexibility and precision, such as 'cultural heritage', 'empirical facts', and 'hypotheses critically'. Less common lexical items are attempted with adequate awareness of style and collocation, as seen in phrases like 'community heritage' and 'theoretical scientific concepts'. There are occasional minor inaccuracies in word choice, but these do not impede communication. The vocabulary deployed is well-suited to an academic discussion, meeting the standards of Band 7.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5
A good variety of complex structures is employed throughout the response, including conditional-like clauses and subordinate clauses such as 'While studying history gives young people useful knowledge...' and 'If schools focus more resources on science...'. There are frequent error-free sentences, demonstrating a strong command of grammar and punctuation. While a few minor slips occur, control over complex sentence forms remains good and communication is never impeded. This performance sits comfortably within the Band 7 range.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.