Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Nowaday, there is an increasing debate amoung the community. Some people think that history is one of the significant school subjects. While other individuals believe that new subjects such as technology and science is more important than history. This essay will disscuss both opinion and give reasons for each opinion.

People who believe that history is vital than science subjects argue this view by indicate that history subject teach pupils the history of thier contry and the pillar persons of their country. Moreover, this subject give learners the awarness about the historic areas in thier country and across the world too. This trend boost the love of the country amoung young people.

On the other hand, individuals who believe that science and technology subjects are more vital, suggest that in the present time science subjucts regarded as a fundamental pillar for developing the country especially with the development amount the world on these subjects.These subjects enable gouvernoment to creat new facilitates that can help residents on thier daily life.

In my opinion, I see that science subjects are more essential in the current time, because of the significant merits that we get from these subjects. However, this does not mean we can ignore the history subjects.

To sump up, although the importance of the modern subjects in our life, we should not ignore the history once.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt by discussing both views on whether history or science and technology are more important school subjects, and concludes with a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, noting that history fosters patriotism and cultural awareness while science fuels modern development and practical facilities. However, the task achievement is heavily impacted by two major issues. First, the response is under-length, containing only 226 words against the mandatory 250-word minimum, which incurs a direct penalty. Second, the ideas are relatively basic and lack sufficient depth or extended support. For instance, the discussion on science only briefly mentions 'new facilitates that can help residents on thier daily life' without providing concrete examples. Because of the under-length nature and limited idea development, the score is capped at a band 5.5.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay displays a logical overall arrangement with a recognisable introduction, body paragraphs addressing each viewpoint, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is attempted, with distinct blocks of text for different perspectives. However, the use of cohesive devices is frequently mechanical and repetitive, such as starting consecutive sentences and paragraphs with phrases like 'People who believe', 'On the other hand, individuals who believe', and 'In my opinion, I see'. Furthermore, referencing is sometimes unclear, and the progression of ideas lacks smooth transitions. There are also formatting issues with paragraph indentation and spacing. Overall, the structural framework is present but suffers from awkward mechanical linkages and basic sequencing, warranting a band 5.0.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student uses a limited vocabulary range that is minimally adequate for the task. There are frequent spelling errors throughout the essay, including 'Nowaday' instead of 'Nowadays', 'amoung' instead of 'among', 'disscuss' instead of 'discuss', 'thier' instead of 'their', 'awarness' instead of 'awareness', 'gouvernoment' instead of 'government', 'creat' instead of 'create', 'facilitates' instead of 'facilities', and 'sump up' instead of 'sum up'. Collocations are also weak, such as 'pillar persons' instead of 'prominent figures' or 'key historical figures', and 'vital than' instead of 'more vital than'. While the intended meaning can generally be understood, the high density of lexical errors and restricted word choice prevent the response from achieving a higher band score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, such as conditional and concessive clauses ('While other individuals believe that...'). However, grammatical control is weak, and errors are frequent. There are multiple issues with subject-verb agreement, such as 'subjects like Science and technology is' (should be 'are') and 'history subject teach' (should be 'subjects teach' or 'the history subject teaches'). Other structural errors include missing articles ('teach pupils the history of thier contry'), incorrect prepositions ('vital than science subjects'), and clumsy phrasings ('suggest that in the present time science subjucts regarded as'). Because complex structures frequently contain errors that cause some difficulty and distraction for the reader, the writing sits firmly in the band 5.0 category.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.