Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-27
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 4.5)
Here are two major factors that some peole believed the History is one of the most important subjects for every school. On the other hand some peole believed that Science and technology are more important subjects than History in the modern today's world.
History, firstly we will discuss about it.History tells us whatever was in the past.For example, history teach us that how we can survive today's world and tell us whatever had happened in our prior.History is also have important part in education system because it tell us about our prior sitution and famous personality which have very huge status.But now science and technology has greatly version in the modern world so that's why some people consider its more flexible.But history also is a source to known about our prior conditions and situations.
One major point are science and technology subject.Today this world has changed in the global village.Furthermore, now we will do every work from the help of technology.For example, technology is source of commmunicate, talks and it provides many severals benefits which is very good and greatfull. So that's why some people do prefer that science and technoloy subject are very important in the schools.Mostly school has this kind of subject which provides this education to own students.
In Conculsion,History has are very important subject but nowdays every country has modern things therefore,technolgy and sciences subects are very beneficial.Government should take react on it.In every school should gives this kind of subjects. Because it will make to our student more strong and Independed.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.0 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
The response addresses both parts of the task by discussing the importance of history alongside science and technology, and a personal opinion is presented at the beginning and end. However, the development of ideas is limited and repetitive. For instance, the points about history simply restate that it tells us about the past and prior situations without deeper expansion. Similarly, the arguments for science and technology rely on general statements like 'technology is source of commmunicate' without exploring specific societal impacts. Because ideas are underdeveloped and lack substantive support, the response fits best at Band 5.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The text is divided into paragraphs, but the overall progression lacks smooth logical flow. Transitional markers are often awkward, repetitive, or misused, such as 'History, firstly we will discuss about it' and 'One major point are science and technology subject.' Paragraphing is attempted, but the grouping of ideas is disjointed, especially within the body paragraphs where sentences bounce between history and technology without clear cohesion. Referencing is frequently unclear ('it tells us about our prior sitution'). These issues in logical organisation and cohesive devices place the response at Band 4.5, rounded to 5.0 based on general paragraph structure.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.0
The vocabulary used is basic and repetitive. Words like 'important', 'subject', 'world', and 'prior' are overused throughout the essay. There are also numerous word choice and collocation errors, such as 'peole' (people), 'greatly version', 'prior sitution', 'source of commmunicate', and 'greatfull'. Attempts to use less common vocabulary either result in incorrect forms or obscure meaning. The range is minimally adequate to convey the basic topic, but frequent inaccuracies mean the lexical control aligns with Band 4.0.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0
The response features a very limited range of grammatical structures. Simple sentences dominate, and attempts at complex structures are almost entirely marred by severe errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('History is also have', 'One major point are'), incorrect tense usage ('teach us that how we can survive'), and faulty prepositions ('from the help of technology'). Punctuation and spelling errors are widespread throughout the text. Due to frequent grammatical errors that often impede readability and cause difficulty for the reader, the grammar score is Band 4.0.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.