Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Education plays a vital role in shaping youngs mind . There is ongoing debates that history is most important subject from the past while other argue that science and technology is provital subject in todays modern world. Today i will discuss both of views and supports my opinion with examples.

Firstly, history supporters think that history helps students learn from the past forexample world wars that how there ancesters succeed in these wars and what mistakes they did. they can improves these mistakes and learn alots from their ancesters. Furthermore it gives information about humans developments that how human evolved.

On the other hand some people also believe that science and technology is most crusial subject for ever in todays repiy growing world. They prepare students for future , give job oppurtunities . Forexamples countries like japan and south korea are most advanced because they pay more focus on science amd technology. Moreover science and technology encourage problem solving creativity which are vital skill in todays 21 centuries. Take another example of advancements in medical area such as vaccines and surgical ropots saves millions of lifes. moreover electric vehicles reduce dependency on fossil fuels which altemately reduce air pollutions at the atmosphere.

In my points of views while history is important for building awarness and moral understanding but science and technology have greater practical value. It not only connects people globally but also solving major global issues such as climates changesand disease. Overall i support science amd technology as a provital subject for upcoming generation to pay more attention .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views on the importance of history versus science and technology, and a clear personal opinion is stated in the conclusion. Ideas are relevant, such as mentioning the World Wars for history and advancements in medical fields or robotics for science and technology. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat limited and repetitive. For instance, the discussion on science and technology clusters several points together without fully elaborating on each one. The student attempts to provide examples like Japan and South Korea, which adds support, but the overall depth of exploration aligns best with Band 6 descriptors where relevant ideas are present but slightly under-developed in places.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with clear paragraphing separating the introduction, the two body paragraphs, and the conclusion. However, cohesion is frequently faulty and mechanical. The student relies heavily on repetitive transitional phrases such as 'Furthermore', 'Moreover', and 'Take another example'. Paragraphing is present, but referencing and logical progression within paragraphs can be disjointed, as seen in the third body paragraph where multiple disparate points are crammed together with weak linking. The opening also shows abrupt transitions. These features are characteristic of Band 5, where there is some organization and paragraphing, but cohesive devices are often inadequate or repetitive.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully using terms like 'advancements', 'dependency', 'fossil fuels', and 'problem solving'. However, there are noticeable spelling and word-choice errors throughout the text, such as 'youngs mind' instead of 'young minds', 'debates' instead of 'debate', 'provital' instead of 'pivotal', 'ancesters' instead of 'ancestors', 'alots' instead of 'a lot', 'crusial' instead of 'crucial', 'oppurtunities' instead of 'opportunities', 'climates changesand' instead of 'climate change and', and 'air pollutions at the atmosphere' instead of 'air pollution in the atmosphere'. These lexical errors and awkward collocations cause some difficulty for the reader and reflect a Band 5 level.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating clauses with 'such as' and relative pronouns. However, control over grammar and punctuation is weak, with frequent errors that disrupt readability. Examples include missing articles ('in todays modern world', 'in medical area'), incorrect verb tenses and agreement ('what mistakes they did. they can improves', 'surgical ropots saves'), run-on structures, and widespread punctuation and capitalization issues (e.g., lowercase 'i', missing apostrophes). Complex sentences are frequently faulty. Because the frequency of errors is high and affects basic grammatical accuracy, the response falls into the Band 5 category for grammar.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.