Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-28
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
People have different views on whether history is the most crucial subject in school or science and technology related subjects are more important than history. I believe subjects like science and technology are the most important subjects owing to the fact that science and technology related subjects offer a wide range of future opportunities and make student more creative and innovative.
History is a crucial subject in both elementary and secondary school. As an illustration, students can learn about . However, students who are experts in history will be unable to cope with the upgradation of science and modern technology without knowledge enough in science and technology in future.
There are reasons why seience and technology related subjects are important in school. Firstly, those subjects can provide students a wide range of career opportunities after their graduation. A student who is an expert in technology, usually get more job opportunity than a student who is expert in history. Currently the whole world relay on technology, and there are crying needs of IT and technology experts. Gient companies Like Meta, Open AI hiring IT and technology experts. Secondly, these subjects make students more innovative and creative. A student can do many research works on chemicals, trees event with any human aspects if the student have interest in Chemistry and Biology. Students can lern and invent new theories bassed on their research. For instance, genious such as Newton, Einestine did many research work in their life and invented many fundamental theories for us, and those theories are really useful for us.
In conclusion, I firmly believe technology and science related subjets are more important than history in school on the grounds that those subjects help students to be more creative and innovative as well as provide a wide range of future opportunities.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views—the importance of history and the greater importance of science and technology—and presents a clear personal opinion. The position is maintained throughout the essay. However, the development of ideas is somewhat uneven. For instance, the paragraph dedicated to history is very brief and contains an incomplete sentence ('students can learn about .'). On the other hand, the arguments supporting science and technology are better supported with reasons and examples, such as mentioning Meta, OpenAI, and historical figures like Newton and Einstein, even though some minor factual or spelling slips occur. Overall, the task is adequately fulfilled, corresponding to a Band 6.0 level.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with clear paragraphing separating the introduction, the discussion of the opposing view, the main supporting body paragraph, and the conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'Firstly', 'Secondly', and 'In conclusion' are used to structure the text, although referencing and linking can occasionally feel slightly mechanical. For example, the transition between the second paragraph and the third paragraph is somewhat abrupt. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and appropriately, but logical progression could be smoother. This level of organisation aligns well with a Band 6.0 descriptor.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common items such as 'innovative', 'fundamental theories', and 'career opportunities'. However, there are noticeable spelling and word-choice errors throughout the text, including 'upgradation' instead of upgrading or advancement, 'seience' instead of science, 'relay' instead of rely, 'Gient' instead of giant, 'hiring' instead of are hiring, and 'genious' instead of geniuses. Despite these inaccuracies, communication is not impeded, and the vocabulary remains minimally sufficient for Band 6.0.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The response demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, such as 'I believe subjects like science and technology are the most important subjects owing to the fact that...' However, there are frequent grammatical and punctuation errors. Examples include missing articles ('a student who is expert in history'), subject-verb agreement issues ('usually get more job opportunity'), preposition errors ('do many research works on'), and an incomplete sentence in the second paragraph. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they persist throughout the essay, preventing the score from reaching Band 6.5. A Band 5.0 is appropriate here.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.