Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-02
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is often argued that history is very curcial subject in curriculm, other believe that beside history, science , and technology are more important than history. It has both merits which will be demonstrate in the subsequent fragments with my personal opinion.
On the one hand, history is important subject because it teach about past. Moreover, without history we do not learns about past such as king wars, climate disasters, and also any location history. In onter words, when we visit any older location we learn and see about there older history in books , which is very important. Nowadays, most of the books are show earlier situations and also repersent older people culture. For instance, bible and hindu granth which illustrates the past culture and what happned in past. Therefore, history is important subject for students .
On the other hand, along with history , science and technology is also play vital role. firstly, due to seience human have made made a lot of progress in education, health, and aslo transport. In additions, Due to seceice we use mobile celetronic devics and transport system. Secondly, because of technology we made satelites and rockets which is use for explore space and also made sumerine and search deep ocean. To exemplify, recently American space compeny lonched space rocket which explore outer space and provide another planet information for. better future. Hence, science and technology is linked and i modern era it is very important .
In conclusion, history is crucial subject which provide past information. However, I believe that secince and tenchology other subjects are far more significant than history, due to advance technology and better products which make daily life easier .
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both the importance of history and the counter-perspective regarding science and technology, while also presenting a clear personal opinion in the introduction and conclusion. However, the development of ideas is uneven. While the arguments for science and technology are somewhat elaborated with examples like satellites and rockets, the points regarding history remain relatively limited and under-developed, relying on repetitive assertions rather than deep exploration. The response successfully covers the prompt requirements overall, but greater extension of the main body arguments, particularly regarding historical education, would be needed to reach a higher level of task response.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The essay presents a coherent overall arrangement with a clear identifiable structure, utilizing an introduction, two distinct body paragraphs discussing opposing views, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate ideas. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical and faulty. While basic cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', 'Moreover', and 'In conclusion' are employed to signpost the progression of ideas, referencing is not always clear, and some transitions feel abrupt or repetitive. The logical progression is somewhat hindered by mechanical linking rather than smooth semantic flow between sentences.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, demonstrating a sufficient range to communicate basic concepts. The writer attempts less common vocabulary items such as 'curcial', 'subsequent', and 'significant', but these attempts are accompanied by noticeable errors in word choice, spelling, and word form, such as 'curcial' instead of 'crucial', 'curriculm' instead of 'curriculum', and 'celetronic devics' instead of 'electronic devices'. These lexical inaccuracies and spelling errors are frequent enough to cause some difficulty for the reader, though communication of the main arguments is generally maintained.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The writer demonstrates a limited range of sentence structures, relying heavily on simple forms and attempting some complex sentences that are frequently faulty. There are persistent errors in articles, subject-verb agreement, plurals, and verb forms throughout the text, such as 'history is important subject', 'it teach about past', 'science and technology is also play', and 'due to seience human have made made a lot of progress'. Punctuation and grammatical patterns also exhibit frequent errors that require the reader to occasionally pause, fitting the description of frequent errors that can cause some difficulty for the reader.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.