Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

One part of genral public argue that, history should be taught in schools with high importance. Whilst other believe that science related subjecs should be given more attention. This essay will examine both prespectives before explaining why I believe thatt there should be a balance between them.

On one side, People gave high improtance to History, as it reflects a culture. In other words, history states different important features of the past that help us to understant ancient cultures, this results in to diversifing of human civilization. Moreover, It help us in making right decisions. This is because, history represents, stories of empire evolution along with there fall, this helps a person to identify reasos for the distruction. Consecquently, an aware person try to skip those mistakes.

On the other hand, some peopple gave more importance to science and tecnology based subjects, as it helps in developmet of sustainable technologies. In other words, our contemporary ear is moving towards environmental distruction duue to vast use of fossil fule, Thus we need to develop a sustainable solution in order to save this planet. Therefore, study related to science and tecnologies should be more preferd. Moreover, This can lead to economic development. In other word mordern studies reveal hidden importance of raw materials, this development can hep the economic concentration of whole world. For example, extensive usage of silvier causes its prices to raise, shifting different economies.

In conclusion, Although there is a conflict among public regarding importance of a subject, I believe that both, History and Science have their own merits in terms of historic lessons and sustainable future. They should be taught with equal importance without effecting ech other.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views on the importance of history versus science and technology subjects, and provides a clear personal opinion in the introduction and conclusion. The ideas presented are generally relevant, such as how history reflects culture and how science fosters sustainable technologies. However, some ideas are under-developed rather than fully extended. For instance, the point about avoiding past mistakes through historical study is introduced but lacks a concrete example to substantiate it. To reach a higher level, the writer would need to fully develop all main ideas with more robust supporting arguments and specific examples throughout the body paragraphs, ensuring every point is explored to its fullest potential.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay demonstrates a coherent overall arrangement with a clear, logical progression from the introduction through the body paragraphs to the conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct ideas, with each body paragraph focusing on one side of the argument. Cohesive devices are employed, such as 'On one side', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion', which help guide the reader through the text. However, cohesion sometimes feels a bit mechanical or repetitive in its transitional phrasing, and referencing can occasionally be slightly unclear, such as pronoun use referring back to abstract concepts. To progress further, the writer should employ a wider and more flexible range of cohesive devices and ensure smoother transitions between sentences without relying on formulaic connectors.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The writer demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common lexical items such as 'diversifying', 'sustainable', and 'contemporary'. However, there are noticeable limitations and inaccuracies in word choice, collocation, and spelling throughout the response. Examples include spelling errors like 'genral', 'subjecs', 'prespectives', 'improtance', 'understant', 'distruction', 'Consecquently', 'tecnology', 'developmet', 'duue', 'fule', 'preferd', 'mordern', and 'ech', alongside awkward phrasing like 'economic concentration'. These errors occur with some frequency and occasionally require the reader to pause, though they do not completely impede communication. To achieve a higher band, the writer needs to expand their lexical repertoire, improve spelling accuracy, and demonstrate more precise control over word forms and collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response displays a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, attempting structures like conditional and relative clauses. There are several grammatical and punctuation errors present, including issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'Subjects like Science and technology is' or pronoun references), incorrect article usage, and awkward prepositional patterns. Despite these errors, the sentence structures are varied enough, and the mistakes rarely impede overall communication. To move to the next level, the writer must increase the proportion of error-free sentences by exercising greater control over complex sentence patterns, punctuation, and basic grammatical rules such as pluralisation and article selection.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.