Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-16

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Few individuals think history is one of most crucial part of curriculum in school level. while the others believe instead of History , science and technology are more beneficial in the current era. I believe Science and technology plays a crucial role for modernisation of our society. in this essay, i will discuss both sides and conclude in my own opinion.

On the one hand, History plays a vital role in remembering of our national heroes, legends and brave soldiers who fought for saving the dignity of the whole nation. The stories are still mentioned in our history books that motivates and encourages us to fight for our country like they did. If yhe history is removed from our curriculum system tjhen the next generation will not be able to studying the morals and traditions of our ancestors.

On the othet hnnd, science and technology gains more importance than history because of playing a beneficial role in inventing new technologies and producing products which are the needs of our modern era.In addition to this Science revoulutionlized the way of our living

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You address both sides of the discussion and state a preference for science and technology, so the response is relevant to the question. The point about history preserving national heroes and teaching the next generation about ancestors gives one reason for its importance. However, the discussion is only partial: the science-and-technology paragraph ends before explaining its effects, and your opinion is asserted rather than supported with a specific example or developed reasoning. The introduction also promises a conclusion, but none is provided. The response contains 181 words, which is below the required 250, leaving important parts of the argument underdeveloped. To improve, complete both sides, explain why your preferred subjects matter, and add a clear concluding paragraph.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph beginning “On the one hand,” and a contrasting paragraph beginning “On the other hand.” These signposts help the reader identify the two viewpoints. However, the progression is incomplete because the second body paragraph stops after the unfinished point about how science has changed living, and there is no conclusion to bring the discussion together. Some links between ideas are also awkward: “The stories are still mentioned … that motivates” does not clearly connect the stories to the effect, and “In addition to this” introduces no completed supporting idea. Develop each paragraph around a complete point, use clear references, and finish with a summary of your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt topic-related vocabulary, including “national heroes,” “dignity,” “ancestors,” “modern era,” and “inventing new technologies.” These choices show an effort to discuss both historical and contemporary subjects. However, the range is limited and some phrases are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “remembering of our national heroes,” “at school level,” and “plays a crucial role for modernisation.” Spelling errors, including “revoulutionlized,” “yhe,” and “tjhen,” also distract from the message. Aim for more precise collocations and check spelling carefully. For example, you could describe history as helping students “understand their national heritage” and say that technology “supports modernisation” or “improves everyday life.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use some longer sentence forms, including a conditional structure: “If the history is removed … the next generation will not be able to…” This shows an attempt to express cause and consequence. However, control is inconsistent, and several errors affect clarity. In “the stories … that motivates,” the verb does not agree with its subject; “science and technology gains” also needs a plural verb. The phrase “will not be able to studying” uses the wrong verb form after “able to,” and the opening has sentence-boundary and capitalisation problems, such as “school level. while.” Practise subject–verb agreement, infinitive forms, and accurate sentence punctuation, then proofread each sentence for a complete grammatical structure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.