Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In modern world, numerous tell that history is one of the most significant part learn subjects in the school. While, other argue that the today genration subjects likewise Science and technology are more enssential part than history. I partially agree with the given statement.

At the initial stages, nowadays many sineor citizen told that history give lost of vital information about the ancient culture and their livelihood. However, history can leraned vareity of different speice and animals that individuals are using their equipment for huntings. Moreover, in many museum today residents can easily watched and understand due to scientis had investigating perpectly. For instance, in Goa art library which is added various disign and their part of ancent animal body part which is upload. Finally, youngster today have to understanding more about the history in their school subjects.

On the other hand, many citizens say that in school subjects like Science and technology more tough owing to Science which assist them to know about different type of organ in our body parts. Moreover, technology will facilitiate vareity of new modern innovation in many urban area. For Example, in the school majority of many indians school they try to teach about science more due in the science their are three type such as Chemistry, Biology and Physcis although in their beginning school life teacher are not focusing to leraned technology.

To conclude, individuals have to learn both Science and History owing to in future both will be affected beneficial in their lives. From my perspective, majority of youngster have to main focuing in Science due to today many urban society they development with vareity.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both sides by discussing the value of learning about ancient cultures and the usefulness of science and technology, and you give a personal view in the introduction and conclusion. However, the position is not fully consistent: you say “I partially agree,” then conclude that students should focus mainly on science, without explaining how this qualifies as partial agreement. Several supporting points are difficult to understand or only loosely connected to the question, such as the example about a “Goa art library” and animal body parts. Develop fewer, clearer reasons and explain how each supports the relevant view. A more direct comparison of what history and science each contribute would make the response more complete and persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Phrases such as “On the other hand” and “To conclude” help signal these stages. However, progression within the body paragraphs is uneven, and some links between sentences are unclear. For example, the discussion moves from ancient culture to hunting equipment and then to a museum example without clearly showing how these points connect. “Moreover” is repeated to add ideas, but the relationship between those ideas is not always explained. Use topic sentences that state each paragraph’s main point, then arrange supporting details in a clear sequence and use referencing to show how examples relate to the argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “ancient culture,” “vital information,” “innovation,” and “urban area,” and you use some variation rather than relying entirely on basic words. However, the range is limited and many word-choice, spelling, and collocation errors make parts difficult to interpret, such as “lost of vital information,” “different type of organ,” and “modern innovation.” Some expressions appear to be intended as academic language but are not used naturally. Focus on accurate, familiar collocations before trying more elaborate phrasing, and check spelling carefully. For example, describe what history teaches about past societies, and explain specifically how science or technology benefits students or communities.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use both simple sentences and attempts at longer structures, including clauses introduced by “while,” “owing to,” and “although.” This shows an effort to vary sentence forms. However, complex sentences are often faulty, and frequent errors in articles, agreement, verb forms, and sentence construction can make meaning difficult to follow. For instance, “history give lost of vital information” has problems with subject–verb agreement and sentence formation, while “teacher are not focusing” has an agreement error. Some clauses also lack a clear grammatical connection to the main idea. Practise building accurate sentences with one main clause and a clearly attached supporting clause, then check articles, plural forms, and verb agreement.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.