Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today’s world subjects like Science and technology are more important than History.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example form your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some people argue that History is the most essential subject in schools, while other people think that science and technology subjects are the most important subjects in schools in this era. I believe that STEM subjects are important than the history in this modern world.

On the one hand, some people think that history subject should be taught on the priority basis than other subjects. This is because pupils would get a chance to learn about its country's history. For example, if a teacher give lessons on the history of Pakistan, learners will learn the sacrifices of people made at the time of independence. Consequently, it will enhance patriotism in the students for the country. Proponents of this view say that it is important to tell the stories about the history of the country in this subject which science subjects cannot teach.

On the other hand, other people claim that we should prioritize science and technology subjects over the history. This is mainly because students will contribute in the STEM field in the future if they get early training in the classrooms. For instance, Arfa Karim, who was a prominent personality in Pakistan in the technology field. She learned the basics in her school and contributed in the microsoft field. Consequently, she became popular because she had strong grip in the science subjects in her school era.

In conclusion, some people think history subject should be given the most importance in schools, I disagree. In this technology world, science subjects can make a significant difference in innovations which history subject cannot.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both views and state your position clearly: you support science and technology because they can contribute to innovation. The Pakistan-history example also explains how learning about independence may foster patriotism, while Arfa Karim gives a relevant illustration of achievement in technology. These examples make the discussion specific. However, the two sides are not developed equally: the history paragraph focuses mainly on national identity, and the STEM paragraph asserts that early classroom training leads to future contribution without explaining how this happens or considering wider benefits. Your conclusion repeats your preference but could weigh the two subjects more directly. Develop the reasoning behind each example and clarify why your chosen subjects matter more in contemporary life.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, one paragraph for each viewpoint, and a conclusion. The signposts “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” make the progression easy to follow, and examples are placed with the relevant arguments. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some of the flexibility associated with stronger cohesion. However, links can feel mechanical, particularly the repeated “Consequently,” and the conclusion’s opening sentence joins two complete ideas with only a comma. Some references, such as “this subject,” could be more precise. Use a wider range of natural transitions and connect each example explicitly to the claim it supports.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “patriotism,” “independence,” “STEM field,” and “innovations,” which helps communicate the main ideas. There are also attempts at more specific phrasing, such as “prominent personality” and “strong grip.” Some choices and collocations are inaccurate or repetitive, however: “the most essential subject,” “on the priority basis,” and “strong grip in the science subjects” do not sound natural in this context. “History subject” and “science subjects” are repeated rather than varied. These issues do not prevent understanding, but more accurate collocations and controlled paraphrasing would make the argument more precise and fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including conditional and relative clauses: “if a teacher give lessons…” and “Arfa Karim, who was a prominent personality…”. Most sentences communicate their meaning, and the paragraph structure supports readability. Some grammatical errors remain, including subject–verb agreement in “a teacher give,” article and possessive use in “its country's history,” and the comparative construction “STEM subjects are important than the history.” The conclusion also joins two independent clauses with a comma. These are noticeable but generally do not obstruct the message. Check agreement, articles, comparative forms, and sentence boundaries, while continuing to use subordinate clauses to show relationships between ideas.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.