Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In recent years, starvation has become an increasingly serious concern in many part of the world despite the advancement in agriculture indutry. This situation has arisen as a result of various factors. However, several effective measures could be implemented to address this problem.

There are several significant factors associated with this issue. The most noticiable one is unemployment. This is mainly because less number of job opportunities available. For example, people living in many african countries do not have an income to purchase food and skip meals frequently. As a result, they may face to certain health problems such as blood pressure and headache. Another major factor is less accessability to basic facilities. This is because less enough funds to develop many rural areas. As a result, people have to travel long distance to buy food.

Nevertheless, several solutions can be taken to tackle these problems. The most effective approach would be for government to develop rural areas. This would help people to access many basic facilities such as grocery shops and food stalls. Furthermore, government should fund low income families and support employment. As a result, people can start their own business and get income through it. By implementing these solutions, it wold be possible to reduce starvation.

In conluction, food starvation can caused by many factors, particularly low rate of employement and less access to basic facilities. However, I believe that these issues can be effectively addresses through creating enviornment to access food producs and allocating money to low income families to support their life.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses both questions: it identifies unemployment and limited access to facilities as causes, then proposes rural development, support for low-income families, and employment assistance. These are relevant ideas, and the examples about people being unable to afford food and travelling to buy it help explain the problem. However, some points are only partly developed. For instance, the link between unemployment and hunger is clearer than the explanation of how limited facilities cause hunger, and the proposed funding and business support are not explained in much detail. The conclusion restates the main ideas, but the response would be stronger if it explained more fully how agricultural advances fail to reach hungry communities and supported each solution with a specific example or outcome.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, a paragraph on causes, a paragraph on solutions, and a conclusion. The progression from causes to responses is easy to follow, and signposts such as “For example,” “Furthermore,” and “In conclusion” help guide the reader. This meets the lower-band expectations securely and shows some features of stronger organisation. However, cohesion is occasionally mechanical: several sentences begin with “This is because” or “As a result,” and the links between claims are sometimes asserted rather than explained. For example, the move from limited facilities to travelling long distances would benefit from a clearer explanation of how this restricts food access. Use a wider range of linking methods and clearer references to connect ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary is sufficient to communicate the main points, with relevant terms such as “unemployment,” “rural areas,” “low income families,” and “implementing these solutions.” However, the range is limited and several noticeable spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision, including “noticiable,” “accessability,” “conluction,” and “employement.” Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “food starvation,” “less number of job opportunities,” and “less enough funds.” These errors do not prevent the reader from understanding the overall argument, but they make the writing less fluent and occasionally require interpretation. Build accuracy with common collocations related to hunger and public policy, and check spelling and word forms carefully before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response uses a mix of simple sentences and some complex forms, including cause-and-effect clauses with “because” and conditional phrasing such as “By implementing these solutions, it would be possible…”. Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. Examples include “many part of the world” (plural agreement), “This is mainly because less number of job opportunities available” (incomplete clause), “people… may face to certain health problems” (verb pattern), and “food starvation can caused” (passive verb form). Articles and prepositions also need attention, as in “for government” and “travel long distance.” To improve, practise complete clause construction, subject–verb agreement, and accurate verb patterns, then proofread for articles and plural forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.