Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
A considerable amount of population is still starved globally despite having considerable advancement in technology use in agriculture.Advancement ideally leads to progress,nevertheless, a lage number of human beings are get hungry.
There are many determinants which could be responsible for this problem. One of the biggest issue is the polarization of the resources.Rich people becoming more authorised and powerfull, get a firm hold on the available resources.They tend to confine the wealth and eatables to themselves and never allow the lower income people to reach that level by increasing the prices or creating a decline in the supply.Rich and developed countries highjack the global resources which can lead to the economic crisis in the developing countries leaving the residents hungry.For instance, irrigation problems are the considerable ones which need immediate attention.
In addition, mostly the advacement in technology mostly give benefits to those who have access to such facilities.For instance the poor farmer of a developing country could not afford expensive seeds and pesticides for the better production of crops, consequently, the demand for food of that country could not be fullfilled.
This issue can be addressed in a better way if the public and private organizations take a step to balance the resource distribution among the countries.Moreover Some policies could be made and agreed upon worldwide to deminish the problems and aleviate the hunger.
Wealth should not be confine to one country or region.It should be distributed on the basis of equity and equality.
In conclusion, hunger is the major problem faced by the people of most of the countries around the globe despite having considerable advancement in technology made in agriculture. Although , the factors that affect this are very critical, they can be addressed by utilizing government strategies and social approaches.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
The response addresses both questions: it identifies unequal control of resources and limited access to agricultural technology as reasons for hunger, then proposes fairer distribution and international policies. These are relevant ideas, and the examples about farmers being unable to afford seeds and pesticides help explain the technology gap. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explained. The reference to irrigation problems, for example, is not connected clearly to the causes or followed by a specific explanation. The proposed solutions—balancing distribution and making worldwide policies—also remain broad, with little detail about how they would work. Develop each main point with a clear cause-and-effect explanation or a concrete example to make the response more complete.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The essay has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two paragraphs explaining causes, a paragraph on solutions, and a conclusion. Linking expressions such as “In addition,” “For instance,” and “In conclusion” help signal the direction of the discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear. The sentence about irrigation appears after the discussion of wealthy countries controlling resources, but its connection to that point is not explained. Some transitions are also mechanical, and the conclusion largely repeats the introduction rather than drawing the main causes and solutions together. Use clearer links between each claim and its example, and organise the solutions into a more developed sequence.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The response attempts a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “polarization of the resources,” “available resources,” “irrigation,” and “alleviate the hunger.” This shows an effort to discuss the issue beyond basic terms. However, inaccurate word choice, collocation, and spelling are noticeable and sometimes make ideas less precise: “a considerable amount of population,” “authorised,” “highjack,” and “fullfilled” are examples. Repetition of “considerable advancement” and “resources” also limits variety. Aim for natural combinations such as “a large proportion of the population,” “gain control over resources,” and “agricultural advances,” and check spelling carefully. More precise vocabulary would make the argument clearer and more fluent.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
There is an attempt to use both simple and complex sentence forms, including cause-and-effect structures with “despite,” “although,” and “consequently.” The main ideas are generally understandable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity. For example, “a lage number of human beings are get hungry” has an incorrect verb construction, while “One of the biggest issue” has a number-agreement error. Articles and sentence boundaries are also inconsistent, as in “Wealth should not be confine to one country or region.It should…” Some long sentences join several ideas without clear punctuation. Practise accurate verb forms, agreement, and sentence boundaries, while keeping complex sentences controlled.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.