Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-13
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Despite of the advance made in agriculture, many individuals around the world still suffer from hungry. Although, contemporary machines fertilizers,and technology have increase for food production, Nevertheless, people still do not have enough food to eat.
Furthermore, there are several reasons for thses problems.One biggest reason is poverty.Some people do not have sufficient monet to buy food from the market.In develop countries, people have enough food for eat,while impoverished countries human beings are dying from starving. Most people in the communism countries people are unemployment. They have no job available to their countries. For example, if people are unemployment and cannot purchase food to their family from the market.In addition, climate change, flood, and no water facilities can be a cause for food production.For instance, most farmers are lost their crops beacues of bad weather,which reduce food production.
On the other hand, there are several ways to solve this problem. Wealth countries can provide food to poor countries.Government should provide farmer modern machines, better seeds equality,and fertilizer, so that farmers can more produce. From my perspective,food waste should be reduce rather extra food should be distribute among poor people.
Moreover, irrigation systems should be introduced,so that farmers easily give water to their Nowadays,food is diminish day by day because of climate change.In poor countries, there have no enough food available in the markets.Government should solve this issue.In addition, government should provide to people job opportunities,so that people earn more money for buy food.
To conclude, government and farmers are work together. The poverty can be reduce.Every human beings deserves to better food health.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both questions: poverty and unemployment are offered as causes, while food aid, improved farming inputs, irrigation, reducing waste, and job creation are proposed as responses. These are relevant ideas, and the examples about farmers losing crops to bad weather help explain how climate conditions affect supply. However, some points are asserted rather than developed. The contrast between richer and poorer countries is broad, and the reference to “communism countries” is unclear and not explained. The solutions also need more detail about how they would reach hungry people or improve access to food. To strengthen the response, explain the links between causes and hunger more fully and support each main solution with a specific example or consequence.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable overall structure: it introduces the issue, discusses causes, presents solutions, and ends with a conclusion. Paragraphing helps distinguish the main stages of the answer, and connectors such as “Furthermore,” “For instance,” and “On the other hand” show an effort to guide the reader. However, progression is uneven. The solutions paragraph shifts from irrigation to climate change and food availability, then back to government action, so related ideas are not consistently grouped. Some linking phrases are mechanical or do not express the relationship clearly, and references such as “their countries” are difficult to follow. Organise each paragraph around one clear focus and use linking words only where they accurately show the connection between ideas.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “poverty,” “food production,” “climate change,” “irrigation systems,” and “food waste,” which allows you to discuss both causes and possible responses. There are also attempts at more specific language, such as “modern machines” and “better seeds.” However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, word-form, and spelling errors make parts difficult to understand: “suffer from hungry,” “sufficient monet,” “food is diminish,” and “farmers are lost their crops.” Some expressions, including “communism countries,” are imprecise in this context. Build a bank of accurate phrases for hunger and agriculture, and check spelling and word forms so your ideas are expressed more naturally and precisely.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a purpose clause in “so that farmers can more produce” and a conditional example beginning “if people are unemployment.” This shows an effort to connect ideas rather than relying only on short statements. However, complex structures are often faulty, and errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries sometimes make meaning hard to follow. For example, “Government should provide farmer modern machines” and “government and farmers are work together” do not have accurate grammatical patterns. The opening also joins contrasting clauses with “Although” and “Nevertheless” in a confusing way. Practise building complete sentences with one clear main clause, then check subject–verb agreement and verb forms in each sentence.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.