Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Now a days as we know technology has made alot of tasks more easier and had helped was to complete each and every work very quickly. Agriculture has also been effected in a positive way due to advance technologies that are being used for easy farming tasks.

The agriculture has taken a new turn in these up coming years with the help of advance tools that are being used for work because of which the percentage of agriculture has increased and production of various food has also been increased and export or trading of those food that we grow has also increased to a level.

In spite of all these facilities and availability of more food even then there are people who still starve for food and stay hungry due to more corruption and wastage of available food that is not being used in a proper way and is just being wasted and due to the corruption people first try to utilise those things of there businesses and things about there profits.

If we want to reduce all these activities and make sure everyone gets good and they do not have to stay hungry the each and everyone should try to not waste food and should also try to help other by giving food who cannot afford or and very poor that they can't even buy food, we should try to do what ever we can do even if it a very small amount of thing to contribute in this way.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both questions: you suggest corruption and food waste as reasons people remain hungry, then recommend reducing waste and sharing food with people who cannot afford it. These points are relevant, and the final paragraph gives a clear practical response. However, the explanation of causes is limited: corruption is mentioned, but you do not explain how it prevents food from reaching hungry communities, and other possible causes, such as poverty, conflict, or unequal distribution, are not explored. The proposed solutions are also mostly individual actions, with little discussion of broader measures. To develop the response further, explain the links between each cause and hunger, then support each solution with a specific example or detail.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: it introduces agricultural progress, describes increased production, then turns to continuing hunger and possible action. This helps the reader follow the general direction of your answer. However, the first two paragraphs repeat the idea that technology has improved agriculture, while the transition from increased production to corruption and waste is abrupt. Several sentences also contain many connected ideas, making the progression harder to track. Use each paragraph for a distinct purpose, and make the relationship between ideas explicit—for example, explain how food waste or corruption disrupts distribution. Clearer sentence boundaries and more precise linking would make the organisation more effective.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “agriculture,” “production,” “corruption,” “wastage,” and “starve,” so the main subject is clear. However, the range is limited and some expressions are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “the percentage of agriculture has increased,” “good” for food, and “things about there profits.” Spelling and word-form errors, including “alot,” “effected,” and “advance technologies,” also reduce precision. Aim for more exact collocations and avoid repeating general words such as “things” and “food.” For instance, you could refer to “agricultural output,” “food distribution,” and “low-income households” to express your ideas more clearly and appropriately.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentence forms, including a conditional structure in “If we want to reduce all these activities…” and a relative clause in “people who still starve for food.” However, longer sentences are often difficult to control, and errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles, and punctuation occur throughout. For example, “the each and everyone should try” has an incorrect determiner, while “there are people who still starve … and stay hungry” is not smoothly constructed. The opening sentence also combines several clauses without clear punctuation. Practise building accurate short sentences first, then add one subordinate clause at a time; check articles, subject–verb agreement, and sentence boundaries during editing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.