Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-07-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Opinions differ regarding why people around the world still go angry in spite of the advances made in agriculture . While there are reasonable arguments concerning both the problems and solutions, neither perspective fully captures the complexity of this issue. Examining the reasons for this case and what can be done to ensure that there is adequate food throughout the year provides a clearer understanding of the matter.

One compelling reason for this is that there is no capital to support agriculture. Most leaders are corrupt especially in African countries. In Kenya for example, governors propose the idea in the parliament but when given the funds, they misuse them. As a result, citizens may not receive resources allocated to them thus going hungry in spite of the advances made in agriculture.

To overcome this issue, governments should stop corruption by punishing all corrupt leaders. When this is done, I believe all the citizens will access the funds allocated to agriculture and they will have sufficient food. For instance, Kenyan government usually allocates some money for irrigation to arid and semi-arid areas every financial year. If they end corruption and misuse of funds, and use the money to provide water in those areas I am convinced that everyone will have access to adequate food throughout the year. As a result, people enjoy better health and live longer lives.

To conclude, although there are advances in agriculture, people still go hungry because of corrupt officials. In my view, if the government can stop misappropriation of funds, people will have surplus.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: reasons for hunger and potential solutions. However, the development is somewhat limited. The focus is almost exclusively on corruption in Kenya, which makes the argument feel narrow rather than global in scope. While the ideas are relevant, they lack the depth and breadth expected for a higher band score. The position is clear, but the supporting arguments could be more nuanced by considering other factors like climate change, distribution logistics, or economic inequality, which would provide a more comprehensive answer to the prompt.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the problem from the solution. Cohesive devices such as 'One compelling reason', 'As a result', and 'To conclude' are used to guide the reader. However, the progression of ideas is sometimes a bit mechanical, and the transition between the general issue and the specific Kenyan example could be smoother. Overall, the information is easy to follow, and the structure supports the central argument effectively.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks the range and precision required for higher bands. There is a noticeable error in the first sentence where 'go angry' is used instead of 'go hungry', which is a significant slip. While the student uses some relevant terms like 'misappropriation', 'irrigation', and 'allocated', the overall lexical range is somewhat repetitive. To improve, the student should aim to incorporate more sophisticated collocations and avoid basic errors that occasionally distract from the intended meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'Kenyan government usually allocates' (missing article 'The') and 'propose the idea in the parliament' (unnecessary article). While these errors do not impede communication, they are frequent enough to prevent a higher score. The control over punctuation is generally good, but the sentence variety is somewhat limited. Increasing the use of more complex grammatical structures, such as conditional clauses or passive voice, with greater accuracy would help elevate the score.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.