Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-08-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Despite having the state of the art technology, numerous people in the world are starving. In a few decades the technology have developed a lot why individuals are still starving around the world. This has become a heated topic in this contemporary society. Why individuals do not have anything to eat when they have high tech agricultural machinery this will be discussed in this essay.

In the entire world continent Asia is the only continents with the highest percentage of agricultural land. It produces almost seventy five percent of the world crops however in most of the Asian countries people are starving the major reason of that is negligence of the government of these countries. These countries produces agricultural stuff but in order to increase their GDP most of the crops are exported to foreign countries. This cause shortage in the market . When the demand increases and the amount sufficient quantity is not in stock in addition the prices increases. This is why poor individuals are not able to purchase the groceries and numerous individuals are starving .

There are few rules and regulations by following these government can made the access of food easy for needy people .First crops should be monitored and controlled before exporting it should be checked that state have enough by doing this the prices can remain stable in addition if this goes for a long time prices can decreased which is quiet great for the lower and middle class individuals . Lastly government should give subsidies to farmers on agricultural items because highly qualified workers and expensive tools are required to operate these machinery .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: reasons for hunger and potential solutions. However, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. For example, the claim that Asia produces 75% of the world's crops is a significant over-generalization that lacks factual accuracy, and the explanation of government negligence is repetitive. The solutions provided, such as monitoring exports and providing subsidies, are relevant but could be expanded with more specific examples or deeper analysis to reach a higher band. The position is clear, but the supporting arguments lack the depth required for a higher score.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the flow between and within them is often mechanical. While some cohesive devices are used, such as 'First' and 'Lastly', others are misused or missing, leading to a disjointed reading experience. For instance, the transition 'When the demand increases and the amount sufficient quantity is not in stock in addition the prices increases' is grammatically awkward and lacks logical flow. Referencing is sometimes unclear, and the paragraphing, while present, does not always effectively group related ideas, making the progression of the argument feel somewhat repetitive.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety expected at higher levels. There is a reliance on basic terms like 'agricultural stuff' and 'groceries', which are not ideal for an academic essay. Some word choices are imprecise, such as 'made the access of food easy' instead of 'facilitate access to food'. There are also minor errors in collocation and word formation throughout the text. To improve, you should focus on using more academic collocations and precise terminology related to economics and agriculture.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Issues include subject-verb agreement ('technology have developed', 'countries produces'), missing articles, and awkward phrasing ('this goes for a long time prices can decreased'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the placement of commas and periods. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. Focusing on proofreading for subject-verb agreement and article usage would be highly beneficial.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.