Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-08-16
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 4.0)
The growing influence of agriculture in modern society has sparked various debates. This issue is particularly significant because its impact affects both individuals and communities in multiple ways. In this essay, I will discuss the reason behind the solution aspects of people around the world still go hungry and their implication for society.
On the reason for agriculture many people around the world still hungry, governments for other farmers. The petrol, diesel and other fuel prices high. The government does not supports less lands and government promote more lands, they these go farmer very hungry.
They There is also evident spray fertilizer and seeds or other medicines high rates. They large spray fertilizer and seeds sales no things less his farmer very hungry. The government not recommended free things farmer not crop the fields.
However, the government has sport the other things. For example, values and beliefs related the government support the technology and solved cases of class or seeds, spray fertilizer and medicines the promotes other capacity. By catching the mafia to be punished.
The electricity provided they subsidy. Electricity provided 600 units free.
In conclusion, provide both significant agriculture promote the government and solved the other problems, the challenges and its impact depends on how effectively it is managed society.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.0 |
| Overall | 4.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 4.0
The response fails to address the task adequately. While it identifies the topic of hunger, the ideas are underdeveloped and often incoherent. The essay does not clearly explain the reasons for global hunger or provide logical solutions. The arguments regarding 'mafia' or '600 units of electricity' are disconnected from the prompt. Furthermore, the response is significantly under the 250-word minimum, which severely limits the development of ideas. The response is largely a collection of fragmented thoughts rather than a structured essay, failing to meet the requirements of the task.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 4.0
The essay lacks a logical flow. Paragraphs are disjointed, and there is no clear progression of ideas. The use of cohesive devices is either missing or misused, making it difficult to follow the writer's train of thought. For example, the transition 'However, the government has sport the other things' does not logically connect to the previous paragraph. The structure is mechanical and lacks the necessary linking words to create a coherent argument. The overall organization is weak, and the lack of clear topic sentences makes the essay difficult to navigate.
Lexical Resource — Band 4.0
The vocabulary is very limited and often inaccurate. The student relies on basic, repetitive words and struggles to use terminology related to agriculture or economics correctly. Phrases like 'no things less his farmer' and 'sport the other things' are unintelligible and indicate a lack of control over word choice and collocation. There is no attempt to use less common lexical items, and the errors in word formation and usage frequently impede communication, making the intended meaning unclear throughout the text.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.0
The grammatical range is extremely limited, consisting mostly of simple, fragmented, or ungrammatical sentences. There are frequent errors in subject-verb agreement, tense usage, and sentence structure, such as 'The government does not supports less lands' and 'The electricity provided they subsidy.' These errors are pervasive and often make the text difficult to understand. There is no evidence of complex sentence structures, and the lack of proper punctuation further complicates the reading. The high frequency of errors significantly hinders the reader's ability to grasp the intended message.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.