Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 7.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-08-18
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 7.5)
Although agricultural technology has improved dramatically over the past century, hunger continues to affect millions of people worldwide. This paradox can largely be attributed to unequal food distribution, poverty and conflict. Addressing these underlying issues requires coordinated action from governments and the international community.
One of the principal reasons for persistent hunger is that food is not distributed fairly. Many countries produce more than enough food to feed their populations, yet large quantities are wasted because of inefficient supply chains, poor infrastructure or commercial practices. At the same time, people living in less developed regions often lack reliable access to affordable food. Furthermore, poverty prevents many families from purchasing even basic necessities, regardless of how much food is available in the market.
Another significant factor is war and political instability. Armed conflicts frequently disrupt farming activities, destroy infrastructure and force people to flee their homes. As a result, agricultural production declines while humanitarian aid struggles to reach affected populations. Climate change also worsens food insecurity by increasing the frequency of droughts, floods and other extreme weather events that damage crops.
Several measures can help alleviate this problem. Governments should invest in transport networks, storageacilities and modern farming techniques to reduce food waste and improve distribution. At the same time, international organisations should provide financial assistance and emergency food aid to countries experiencing conflict or natural disasters. Long-term solutions should also focus on reducing poverty through education, employment opportunities and economic development, enabling people to purchase sufficient food independently.
In conclusion, global hunger persists not because the world produces too little food, but because poverty, conflict and unequal distribution prevent many people from accessing it. By tackling these root causes through international cooperation and sustainable development, this long-standing problem can be significantly reduced.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 7.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 7.5 |
| Overall | 7.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5
The response fully addresses both parts of the prompt: explaining the reasons for global hunger and proposing solutions. The position is clear from the introduction and is maintained throughout the essay. Ideas are well-developed, such as the discussion on supply chain inefficiencies and the impact of conflict on agricultural production. The supporting arguments are logical and relevant, providing a comprehensive overview of the issue. The essay is well-structured, with distinct paragraphs for causes and solutions, ensuring that all aspects of the task are covered in a balanced manner. No parts of the prompt are neglected, and the response demonstrates a strong grasp of the topic.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5
The essay demonstrates a clear logical progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the transition between the causes of hunger and the proposed solutions is smooth. Cohesive devices such as 'Furthermore', 'At the same time', and 'As a result' are used effectively to link sentences and ideas. The paragraphing is logical and contributes to the overall clarity of the argument. Referencing is consistent, and the flow of information is natural throughout the text. The structure is highly effective, allowing the reader to follow the writer's argument without any confusion or unnecessary repetition.
Lexical Resource — Band 7.0
The vocabulary is precise and appropriate for an academic context. The writer uses a range of topic-specific terms such as 'inefficient supply chains', 'political instability', 'food insecurity', and 'sustainable development'. The language is natural and demonstrates a good level of sophistication. While the vocabulary is consistently accurate, it stops just short of the 'skilful use of uncommon items' required for a band 9. However, the range is more than sufficient to convey complex ideas with precision, and there are no errors in word choice or collocation that impede communication.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.5
The essay displays a wide range of grammatical structures, including complex sentences with subordinate clauses and passive constructions. The majority of sentences are error-free, and the control over punctuation and syntax is excellent. There are no significant grammatical errors that distract the reader. The writer demonstrates a high level of accuracy, with only very occasional, minor slips that do not affect the clarity of the message. The use of varied sentence lengths and structures contributes to a fluent and professional tone throughout the response.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.