Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-08-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.5)

Despite significant advancements in agricultural practices, millions of individuals around the globe continue to experience hunger and lack access to essential food products. This persistent issue can be attributed to various factors, including economic underdevelopment and inadequate governmental intervention in food distribution and resource management.

One of the primary reasons for this dilemma is the insufficient utilization of available resources in less developed countries. Many of these nations struggle with economic advancement and lack the necessary knowledge or infrastructure to leverage their natural resources effectively. For instance, Ghana, often cited as one of the hungriest countries despite possessing substantial resources such as gold, natural gas, and fertile land, exemplifies this issue. The shortcomings in governance and the inability of the populace to adapt to modern agricultural practices impede progress and exacerbate food insecurity. It is imperative for such nations to reform their political systems and embrace innovative agricultural technologies that can enhance productivity and better manage their resources.

Furthermore, the accessibility and affordability of agricultural products remain significant obstacles for many communities. In contemporary society, challenges such as environmental pollution and climate change undermine agricultural output, complicating efforts to alleviate hunger. Taking France as an example, this country is renowned for its rich agricultural heritage and developed economy. The collaboration between nations to address environmental concerns could pave the way for improved food production systems in both developed and developing countries. Initiatives to foster diplomatic relations, promote trade agreements, and share technological advancements are crucial in enhancing agricultural efficiency and food security.

In conclusion, the paradox of hunger existing alongside agricultural progress highlights a multifaceted issue that requires comprehensive solutions. The distinction between countries like Ghana and France illustrates the varying challenges posed by geography, governance, and resource management. By fostering international cooperation and embracing innovative practices, we can create a more equitable global food system that addresses the pressing issue of hunger and ultimately uplifts humanity as a whole.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion7.5
Lexical Resource7.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy7.5
Overall7.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: reasons for global hunger and potential solutions. The ideas are relevant and logically developed. For instance, the discussion on resource management in developing nations and the role of international cooperation provides a clear framework. However, the development is slightly uneven; while the point about governance is well-supported, the example of France is somewhat vague in its connection to solving global hunger, as it does not explicitly explain how France's agricultural heritage directly aids other nations beyond general diplomatic cooperation. Overall, the position is clear, and the response covers all requirements of the task effectively.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5

The essay is well-organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the progression of ideas is logical. Cohesive devices such as 'Furthermore', 'For instance', and 'In conclusion' are used effectively to guide the reader. Referencing is generally clear, and the paragraphing is appropriate. The flow between the problem (reasons) and the solution (what can be done) is smooth, ensuring the reader can follow the argument without difficulty. The use of cohesive devices is consistent and contributes to the overall clarity of the text.

Lexical Resource — Band 7.5

The vocabulary is varied and appropriate for an academic context. The student demonstrates the ability to use less common lexical items such as 'paradox', 'multifaceted', 'exacerbate', and 'leverage' with precision. Collocations are generally natural, such as 'persistent issue' and 'agricultural output'. There are no significant spelling or word-choice errors that impede communication. The range of vocabulary is sufficient to convey complex ideas with flexibility and precision, fitting the criteria for a high band score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.5

The essay displays a good variety of complex sentence structures, including conditional-like logic and relative clauses. Most sentences are error-free, and the control over punctuation and grammar is strong. For example, the sentence 'The distinction between countries like Ghana and France illustrates the varying challenges posed by geography, governance, and resource management' is grammatically sophisticated and accurate. There are no frequent errors, and the minor slips that might occur do not affect the clarity of the message. The grammatical control is consistent throughout the response.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.