Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Despite significant advancements in agriculture practices and technologies, a considerable number of people worldwide continue to experience food insecurity and hunger. This enduring issue raises concerns about the underlying factors contributing to the persistence of hunger in many regions. In this essay we will delve into the reasons behind this dilemma and explore potential solutions to address the problem.

One prominent reason for the prevalence of hunger despite agricultural progress is the unequal distribution of resources and wealth. In many societies, limited access to arable land, water, and essential inputs like fertilizers and seeds hinders small scale farmers from maximizing their agricultural output. Additionally, economic disparities often result in food being inaccessible to those in need due to high prices or inadequate infrastructure for food distribution .For instance, in developing countries, corrupt systems and inefficient food supply chains can lead to food not reaching vulnerable populations, exacerbating their hunger.

Moreover, environmental factors such as climate change, natural disasters, and soil degradation further exacerbate food insecurity. Unpredictable weather patterns and extreme events like droughts or floods can devastate crops, lending to crop failures and reduced yields, this coupled with insufficient investment in climate resilient agricultural practices, leaves communities vulnerable to food shortages, For example, regions heavily reliant on rain fed agriculture are particularly susceptible to climate variability, impacting their food production abilities.

In conclusion, the paradox of persistent hunger alongside agriculture advancements underscores the need for holistic solutions that address systemic issues, By focusing on equitable resource distribution, improving infrastructure for food accessibility, implementing sustainable agricultural practices, and enhancing resilience to environmental challenges, nations can make significant strides in combating hunger. Governments, international organizations and local communities must work collaboratively to create inclusive food systems that prioritize the well being of all individuals ensuring a more food secure future for generations to come.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt—the causes of hunger and potential solutions—in a balanced manner. The ideas are relevant and well-developed, such as the discussion on unequal resource distribution and the impact of climate change. The position is clear throughout the essay. To reach a higher band, the student could provide more specific, real-world examples beyond general references to 'developing countries' or 'regions,' which would add further depth and authority to the arguments presented.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the progression of ideas is smooth. Cohesive devices such as 'Moreover,' 'Additionally,' and 'In conclusion' are used effectively to link ideas. However, there are minor punctuation errors, such as the comma splice in 'reduced yields, this coupled with...' and the inconsistent spacing before some punctuation marks, which slightly affects the flow. Overall, the paragraphing is appropriate and contributes to a coherent response.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The student demonstrates a good range of vocabulary appropriate for an academic context, using terms like 'food insecurity,' 'arable land,' 'systemic issues,' and 'equitable resource distribution.' There is an attempt to use less common lexical items, which is generally successful. There are a few minor collocation or word-choice slips, such as 'lending to crop failures' (should be 'leading to') and 'agriculture advancements' (should be 'agricultural advancements'). These errors do not impede communication and the vocabulary is sufficient for the task.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The essay displays a variety of complex sentence structures, including conditional and participial phrases. While the majority of sentences are error-free, there are some persistent punctuation issues, specifically comma splices and missing spaces before punctuation marks (e.g., 'distribution .For instance'). These are minor slips rather than systematic errors that impede meaning. The control of grammar is generally strong, and the complexity of the structures used is sufficient to meet the requirements for a high band score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.