Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-16
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 7.0)
Despite significant advancements in agricultural practices, millions of individuals around the globe continue to experience hunger and lack access to essential food products. This persistent issue can be attributed to various factors, including economic underdevelopment and inadequate governmental intervention in food distribution and resource management.
One of the primary reasons for this dilemma is the insufficient utilization of available resources in less developed countries. Many of these nations struggle with economic advancement and lack the necessary knowledge or infrastructure to leverage their natural resources effectively. For instance, Ghana, often cited as one of the hungriest countries despite possessing substantial resources such as gold, natural gas, and fertile land, exemplifies this issue. The shortcomings in governance and the inability of the populace to adapt to modern agricultural practices impede progress and exacerbate food insecurity. It is imperative for such nations to reform their political systems and embrace innovative agricultural technologies that can enhance productivity and better manage their resources.
Furthermore, the accessibility and affordability of agricultural products remain significant obstacles for many communities. In contemporary society, challenges such as environmental pollution and climate change undermine agricultural output, complicating efforts to alleviate hunger. Taking France as an example, this country is renowned for its rich agricultural heritage and developed economy. The collaboration between nations to address environmental concerns could pave the way for improved food production systems in both developed and developing countries. Initiatives to foster diplomatic relations, promote trade agreements, and share technological advancements are crucial in enhancing agricultural efficiency and food security.
In conclusion, the paradox of hunger existing alongside agricultural progress highlights a multifaceted issue that requires comprehensive solutions. The distinction between countries like Ghana and France illustrates the varying challenges posed by geography, governance, and resource management. By fostering international cooperation and embracing innovative practices, we can create a more equitable global food system that addresses the pressing issue of hunger and ultimately uplifts humanity as a whole.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 7.5 |
| Overall | 7.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0
The response fully addresses all parts of the task by exploring the reasons behind global hunger—specifically economic underdevelopment, governance issues, and climate challenges—and proposing viable solutions such as agricultural reform and international cooperation. The writer establishes a clear position in the introduction and maintains it throughout the essay. Ideas are well-developed and supported with relevant examples, such as contrasting the governance and resource challenges in Ghana with the agricultural heritage of France. The main points are extended with appropriate explanations, meeting the criteria for a Band 7.5 or 8.0 descriptor profile in task response.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5
The essay demonstrates clear logical organisation and progression throughout. Each paragraph has a distinct central topic, starting with an introductory overview, moving into specific causes and solutions regarding resource management, addressing environmental impacts, and concluding with a strong summary. Cohesive devices such as 'Furthermore', 'For instance', and 'In conclusion' are used flexibly and appropriately to guide the reader through the text. Paragraphing is managed skilfully, ensuring a cohesive and unified structure that aligns well with the Band 8 descriptors.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.5
The student exhibits a sufficient and flexible range of vocabulary suited to an academic discussion. Less common items such as 'economic underdevelopment', 'food insecurity', 'exacerbate', and 'multifaceted issue' are used with good awareness of style and collocation. Word choices are generally precise, although occasional minor phrasing choices appear, the vocabulary is strong enough to allow fluent communication and precise expression. The lexical control comfortably positions this piece within the Band 7 range.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.5
The response makes use of a wide variety of complex sentence structures with good control. Examples include participial phrases ('often cited as one of the hungriest countries') and subordinate clauses functioning smoothly within longer sentences. The majority of sentences are error-free, and punctuation is handled correctly. Grammatical control remains high throughout, with only very occasional minor inappropriacies that never impede communication. This performance aligns securely with the Band 8 criteria.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.