Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Even though there is a lot of advances made in agriculture, there are many people still go hungry around the world. The main causes why people are still hungry is that natural vegetables are expensive and in some countries there is no access of agriculture. These issues could be addressed by gouverments keeping the price affordable and increasing the agricultural facilities such as farms, gardens.

Natural products, home made remedies are very expensive these days because of the hard work that workers done. Technology made agricultural products are often low-quality than natural products. For instance, In mongolia dairy products are more expensive; even though there is plenty of access to dairy products.

Therefore, even though there is plenty of dairy because of workers hardwork the price is high.

In some countries, most people don't even have an agricultural facilities because of people are busy with city life. For example, in United states there only few agricultural company's.

Possible solutions to the issues at hand may be keeping the price more affordable for citizens.

Many healthy natural products tend to be more expensive than other products and in some countries there is not really many sources of agricultural products because of busy city life. For example, I heard that in some countries natural products are more expensive and people have to buy low-quality products since there is not many opponents who produces agriculture price are high.

In conclusion, the reason people still go hungry even there is advance in agriculture is the high price and no access to agriculture products. These issues could be reduced by keeping the price affordable and building agricultural facilities.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt, identifying causes of global hunger such as expensive natural foods and a lack of agricultural access, and proposes solutions like price controls and expanding agricultural facilities. However, the ideas are underdeveloped and repetitive. For instance, the argument about 'natural vegetables are expensive' is repeated multiple times without clear elaboration. Examples provided, such as mentioning dairy products in Mongolia or 'city life' in the United States, lack clarity and do not strongly support the main points. The position is somewhat unclear due to weak formulation and repetition. Therefore, this performance meets the criteria for Band 5, as it addresses the task only partially with limited, repetitive ideas.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay displays a basic overall structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, progression is frequently hindered by repetitive sentences and poor logical links. For instance, sentences like 'Therefore, even though there is plenty of dairy because of workers hardwork the price is high' disrupt the flow and add little new information. Cohesive devices are used mechanically or inaccurately, such as repetitive use of 'even though' and 'for example'. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal paragraph cohesion is weak, with ideas looping back on themselves rather than progressing. This aligns closely with Band 5 descriptors, where there is some organisation but a lack of clear overall progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is basic and repetitive, frequently circling around words like 'agriculture', 'products', 'expensive', and 'hungry'. There are noticeable word choice errors and awkward collocations, such as 'access of agriculture', 'agricultural facilities such as farms, gardens', and 'workers done'. Spelling mistakes and grammatical slips related to vocabulary also appear, such as 'gouverments'. While the meaning can generally be understood, the limited and repetitive range of vocabulary causes some difficulty for the reader, fitting the Band 5 level where the lexical resource is minimally adequate but heavily restricted.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The essay demonstrates a limited range of sentence structures, relying heavily on simple and repetitive complex patterns. Attempts at complex sentences frequently result in grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('there is a lot of advances', 'there are many people still go hungry', 'there only few agricultural company\'s') and awkward phrasing. Punctuation and article usage are also inconsistent throughout the text. Because errors occur frequently and can occasionally cause confusion or difficulty for the reader, the writing sits comfortably within the Band 5 descriptor for grammatical accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.