Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Despite significant advancements in agricultural technology, hunger remains a widespread issue worldwide. This persistant issue can be attributed to various factors such as ecoronie economic underdevelopment, food distribution inequalities and climate change impacts.

To begin with, one of the primary reason for the prevalance of hunger despite agricultural progress is the unequal distribution of resources and wealth. In many societies, limited access to arable land, water and essential inputs like fertilizers and seeds hinders small scale farmers from maximizing their agricultural output. Additionally, ecnomic underdevelopment is another factor that leads to the prevalance of hunger. Many nations struggle echonomically and lack the necessary knowledge or infrastructure to leverage their natural resources effectively. For example, Ghana, often cited as one of the hungiest countries despite possessing substantial resources such as gold, natural gas and fertile land. The short comings in government and the inability of the people to adapt to modern agricultural practice results in food insecurity. Furthermore, for many societies the accessibility and affordability of agricultural products remain a significant challenge. Hurdles such as environmental pollution and climate change undermine agricultural output thus complicating efforts to alleviate hunger. Taking Africa as an example where unpredictable weather, severe droughts and heat waves destroy crops in vulnerable farming regions. In order to pave way for improved food production systems in both developed and developing nations it is necessary to initiate, foster diplomatic relations, promote trade agreements and share technological advancements to enhance agricultural efficiency and food security. Developed nations can provide financial and technical aid to help developing nations adopt sustainable, climate-resilient farming techniques. In addition, authorities can offer subsidies and funds, better transport networks market access, and modern crop storage facilities for small-scale farmers and also encourage farmers to grow essential local food staples.

In conclusion, hunger in a world of abundance is a solvable problem if addressed with a multifaceted approach that targets distribution, economic disparity and environmental resilience.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, successfully identifying the causes of global hunger such as unequal distribution and economic underdevelopment, and proposing practical solutions like international aid, infrastructure development, and sustainable farming. The position is clear throughout, and main ideas are extended and supported with relevant examples, such as referencing agricultural challenges in Africa and the specific case of Ghana. While the ideas are relevant, some parts of the discussion could be slightly more fully developed to reach the highest bands, such as further elaborating on how specific trade agreements directly alleviate food insecurity. Nevertheless, the requirements of the task are well-covered, meeting the criteria for a solid Band 7.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay presents a clear logical organisation and progression throughout. Information and ideas are structured into an introduction, a well-developed body paragraph addressing both causes and solutions, and a concise conclusion. Cohesive devices are used to signal relationships between ideas, such as 'To begin with', 'Additionally', and 'Furthermore'. However, paragraphing is somewhat underutilised, as the vast majority of the essay's content is crammed into a single massive body paragraph rather than being broken down into separate paragraphs for causes and solutions. This impacts the overall flow and structural clarity, justifying a Band 6.0 for this criterion.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully attempting less common lexical items such as 'arable land', 'food insecurity', 'climate-resilient', and 'multifaceted approach'. However, there are notable spelling and word-choice errors that detract from the overall quality, including 'persistant' instead of 'persistent', 'ecoronie economic' (a typographical error), 'prevalance' instead of 'prevalence', 'echonomically', 'hungiest', and 'short comings'. Despite these inaccuracies, communication is not impeded, and the vocabulary used remains minimally adequate to convey complex ideas, placing the response firmly at Band 6.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some control over relative clauses and participial phrases (e.g., 'In order to pave way for improved food production systems... it is necessary to initiate...'). However, punctuation and grammatical errors are frequent enough to cause occasional strain for the reader. For instance, the sentence starting with 'For example, Ghana, often cited as one of the hungiest countries...' lacks a main verb. There are also missing commas in lists (e.g., 'transport networks market access') and minor prepositional inaccuracies. Because the errors occur regularly alongside a decent mix of structures, a Band 6.0 is awarded.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.