Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Despite the development made in agriculture, many people around the globe would still sleep hungry . This is a major problem faced by people of every country in this world . Countries are developing rapidly but still they face hunger as a major issue to tackle with .

To begin with, Hunger is a very major part of people's life , for feeding themselves and their family a man could go to any extent without thinking twice . People need food to have energy , to survive in this world. Through agriculture people get food on their plates and therehave been so many development in agriculture . To provide ease to farmers there are so many new technologies which help them to work efficiently .

Despite the advances made in agriculture, people are yet hungry I believe there are many more factors to pay attention to such as high prices , unemployement and corruption . The world is not as good as it seems . With all the advantages there are also some hardships people have to follow.

The decline in employement rates is also a major cause , people can't afford food for themselves even whene there is enough food out there in the world . The second cause is high prices with no employement and increasing prices people can not afford even one time meal for themselves.

To solve this government should start some meal programmes for the needy ones, and shall see the employement rates also .

In conclusion , to solve this hunger problem we should also avoid wasting our food from our plates and help needy people out there . Government should work on diiferent schemes to provide meals to people .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by identifying why people still go hungry despite agricultural advances, citing factors like high prices, unemployment, and corruption, and offering solutions such as meal programmes and government schemes. However, the ideas are often repetitive and lack deep development or specific supporting examples. For instance, the student states that unemployment and high prices cause hunger, but fails to elaborate on how these factors interact on a broader scale. While a clear position is established, the arguments remain somewhat superficial and lack the extended elaboration required for higher bands, placing the response comfortably at Band 5.5.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay is organised into paragraphs, beginning with an introduction, followed by body paragraphs discussing causes and solutions, and ending with a conclusion. However, the logical progression is hindered by repetitive statements and abrupt transitions. Cohesive devices are sometimes mechanical or used inaccurately, such as the frequent repetition of phrases like 'to begin with' and 'despite the advances made in agriculture'. Paragraphing is attempted, but some paragraphs are very short and consist of fragmented ideas rather than cohesive thematic units. Referencing is occasionally unclear, which disrupts the flow of the argument. Therefore, a Band 5.5 is appropriate for this criterion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student uses a limited but minimally adequate range of vocabulary relevant to the topic, such as 'agriculture', 'unemployment', 'corruption', and 'government schemes'. There are several noticeable spelling errors throughout the text, including 'unemployement', 'whene', 'diiferent', and punctuation spacing issues around commas and periods. Less common vocabulary is attempted with limited success, and some expressions lack precision, such as 'sleep hungry' or 'one time meal'. While the language is generally understandable, the frequency of lexical errors and restricted vocabulary range typify a Band 5.0 performance.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response displays a mix of simple and some attempted complex sentence structures. However, frequent grammatical and punctuation errors occur throughout the text, including comma splices, missing articles, and awkward phrasing such as 'a man could go to any extent' and 'government should start some meal programmes for the needy ones, and shall see the employement rates also.' These errors occasionally cause difficulty or hesitation for the reader. Although the writer can construct basic communicative sentences, the high frequency of grammatical inaccuracies prevents the response from reaching a higher band, making Band 5.0 a fair evaluation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.