Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In the world where we live, despite of a sriking advancement in agriculture technology, a large population still struggle to have a sufficient meal. This is largely because the un-even distributions of quantity of food across the globe. This essay will discuss what steps could be taken to address this problem.

The primary cause of stravation is currpted distribution of food in all over the world. This is beacuse dishonesty and carelessness of the higher authority of countries. The rich population gain more than needed, while the opposite class suffer from starvation. As a result, at one hand, people are more likely to waste quality food when they are give surpass of their need, while on other hand, some are not even getting proper meal for surviving. Another contributing factor is curruption and smuggling. When government provides funds to support poor farmers, it never reaches to their hands instead, it goes in the hands of higher position ministers or politicians. This invitably leads to less overall production, resulting in starvation, despair of farmers and economical loss.

To address this issue, authorities should be sincear and carefull in terms of illigal activities, allowing farmers to get maximum benefits and support from government

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 250 words, finishing at only 201 words, which significantly limits the development of ideas. The student attempts to address both parts of the task by identifying causes, such as uneven distribution and corruption, and briefly mentions solutions regarding government support. However, the second body paragraph cuts off mid-thought, leaving the conclusion entirely unwritten and the solutions underdeveloped. The position is stated initially, but the lack of completion prevents a fully rounded evaluation. Therefore, performance aligns with Band 5 due to the severe under-development resulting from the incomplete length and missing concluding sections.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay demonstrates some basic structural organisation with an introduction and initial body paragraph, but it severely lacks a clear overall progression because the text stops abruptly in the middle of a sentence in the second body paragraph. Paragraphing is attempted, but the final section is unfinished. Cohesive devices are used awkwardly or repetitively, such as 'at one hand' and 'while on other hand'. Referencing is sometimes unclear, for instance, 'it goes in the hands of higher position ministers'. Because the progression of ideas breaks down completely and the essay remains unfinished, the coherence and cohesion are restricted to a Band 5 level.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student has an adequate range of vocabulary for basic communication, attempting less common terms such as 'advancement', 'starvation', and 'smuggling'. However, there are numerous spelling and word choice errors throughout the text, including 'sriking', 'un-even', 'stravation', 'currpted', 'beacuse', 'sincear', 'carefull', and 'illigal'. Collocations are also awkward in places, such as 'higher position ministers' instead of 'high-ranking ministers' or 'corrupt officials'. While the vocabulary is minimally adequate to convey the basic message, the high density of spelling and lexical errors pulls the score down to a Band 5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, such as 'In the world where we live, despite of a striking advancement...' and 'When government provides funds...'. However, grammatical accuracy is weak, featuring frequent errors such as 'despite of' (instead of 'despite'), 'un-even distributions of quantity' (faulty agreement/article use), and punctuation/fragment issues. The second sentence in the first body paragraph contains multiple structural faults like 'at one hand, people are more likely to waste quality food when they are give surpass of their need'. Because complex structures are frequently faulty and errors cause some difficulty for the reader, this warrants a Band 5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.