Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Agriculture plays a vital role in economic and public sectors by providing food and support. Many people around the globe still suffer from malnutrition or food shortages, even though several improvements and utilization of resources are done by the agriculture sector. While, this is caused by the carelessness and negligence of people or sudden fires due to increasing in temperatures, it can still be solved if more awareness is given to the farmers and local people.

To commence with, peoples rash attitudes and climate change has caused many to suffer. The crops may catch fire due to a lit cigarette thrown by a local or anything done in a childs play. While this is concerning, the main issue is how natural events or global warming affects the yield. For example, floods, tornados can destroy the fields in glance and changing temperatures may cause unpreventable fires leading to shortages of food. These fires are actually the main causes of food crises as there prices boost and only the rich can afford them, while the poor goes hungry. Therefore, the food is not distributed amoung everyone equally, leading to the reports that even after enhancements not much betterment is observed due to the above reasons.

In conclusion, these problems can be solved by awareness camps about global warming and how its affecting the overall population, especially the farm sector, with individuals being more focused on their personal doings. The problem remains unevitable consequences and disasters may not be in a persons control but precaustions can still prevent it or minimise the causes.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses the task only partially. While both parts of the prompt—causes and solutions—are touched upon, the ideas remain limited and under-developed. The discussion on causes focuses heavily on narrow or superficial points, such as discarded cigarettes or sudden fires, rather than major systemic socio-economic factors like supply chain failures, poverty, or political instability. Similarly, the proposed solutions are restricted to general awareness camps without exploring actionable agricultural policies or economic interventions. The writer maintains a basic position, but the lack of elaboration and depth prevents the response from moving beyond a partial treatment of the prompt.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is some basic organization with an introduction, body paragraph, and conclusion, but the essay lacks a clear overall progression. Paragraphing is attempted, though the division of ideas feels somewhat abrupt, particularly the transition between the introductory points and the main body. Cohesive devices are used, but they are frequently repetitive or mechanical, such as 'To commence with' and 'In conclusion'. Furthermore, referencing is occasionally unclear, as seen in vague pronoun usage like 'While, this is caused' and 'anything done in a childs play', which disrupts the logical flow and connectedness of the arguments throughout the text.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is limited and minimally adequate for the task. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, such as 'malnutrition', 'global warming', and 'enhancements', but these attempts are often accompanied by noticeable errors in word choice, form, and collocation, such as 'there prices boost' instead of 'their prices surge' and 'amoung' instead of 'among'. Additionally, there are persistent spelling and punctuation mistakes, including 'unevibutable' and missing apostrophes in possessives like 'childs'. These lexical slips and inaccuracies cause some difficulty for the reader and reflect a restricted control over word-level precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The essay displays a limited range of sentence structures, relying heavily on basic patterns alongside attempts at complex sentences that are frequently faulty. There are frequent grammatical errors involving subject-verb agreement, article use, and preposition placement within grammatical structures, such as 'increasing in temperatures' instead of 'increases in temperature' and 'floods, tornados can destroy'. Punctuation errors are also notable, including unnecessary commas that interrupt sentence flow. These frequent errors across simple and complex forms can occasionally cause difficulty for the reader in tracking the intended meaning.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.