Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is considered that in this modern era, many advancements take place in food production whether most of the population in the world in different areas has faced the starvation. This essay will articulate the problems of this notion, along with the relevant solutions to solve this issue.

Commencing with the cause of this trend is that poverty and unemployment. In other words, poor population of a nation cannot afford food because they donot have sufficient budget to buy nutritious food even having quality of crops and food in the market. This is generally because they donot have employment in any field and earn extremely less but the prices of food increases in the market, so that they still face hungry after the development in agriculture. For instance, 25% of Indian population still go hungry everyday, they donot have a job to earn and then buy food for their families. To tackle this problem, the government should raise the job fields and employment programs to give employment to the weaker section of the society.

Furthermore, the second reason associated with this trend is that poor distribution. To explain it, poor distribution and transportation systems prevent food from reaching the remote areas. Basically, remote areas are undeveloped and there is no proper transportation, this results to not reaching food to disadvantaged area of a nation. For example, some part of west Rajasthan donot have roads to provide food to remote area population, which directly impact on the distribution of food unequally. To address this, the government should increase the funds to manage infrastructure like roads and railway tracks, to equally distribute the food to every section of the society. Moreover, the local authorities ought to build some storage to store the food in remote areas for the emergency.

In conclusion, although the local authorities use new technologies in food production; yet the public face hunger, this is because of poverty, unemployment and poor distribution of food. However, the government should raise the fund for giving employment to weaker sections, manage infrastructure and build adequate storage house.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response addresses both questions: it explains hunger through poverty and unemployment, then poor distribution, and proposes employment programmes, infrastructure, and storage. The examples about India and western Rajasthan help make the discussion relevant, and the conclusion restates the main causes and remedies. Some ideas are more fully explained than others: the link between low income and inability to buy food is clear, while the distribution point would benefit from more detail about how transport or storage failures lead to shortages. The proposed solutions are relevant, but their likely impact is asserted rather than explained. To strengthen the response, develop each cause-and-solution link with a specific explanation or example and avoid unsupported generalisations such as the statistic about India.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs organised around separate causes, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “Furthermore,” “For instance,” and “To address this” helps readers follow the progression, and each paragraph generally stays focused on its main point. However, some linking is mechanical: both body paragraphs follow a similar cause–explanation–example–solution pattern, and “In other words” and “To explain it” do not always add much. There are also places where references are imprecise, such as “this trend” and “this,” which can make the connection between a claim and its explanation less clear. Use a wider range of natural transitions and make links between ideas more explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The response uses relevant topic vocabulary, including “starvation,” “food production,” “distribution,” “transportation systems,” and “infrastructure.” These choices allow the writer to discuss both economic access and the movement of food. However, several phrases are unnatural or imprecise, such as “raise the job fields,” “face hungry,” and “build some storage,” while “poor population” and “weaker section” are repeated rather than expressed more precisely. The repeated use of “food” and “government” also limits flexibility. These word-choice and collocation problems sometimes make the reader pause, although the main meaning remains understandable. Aim for accurate, natural combinations such as “create employment opportunities,” “experience hunger,” and “storage facilities,” and vary repeated terms where appropriate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

There is an attempt to use both simple and complex sentences, including clauses with “because,” “which,” and “although,” and the overall meaning is usually clear. However, some grammatical errors recur. The opening sentence has an unclear structure (“many advancements take place … whether most of the population … has faced”), and “the cause … is that poverty and unemployment” needs a grammatical complement. Other examples include “some part … donot have roads,” where subject–verb agreement is faulty, and “which directly impact,” where the verb does not agree with its subject. Articles and sentence construction also need attention in phrases such as “build some storage to store the food.” Review clause formation, agreement, and article use, then proofread to catch errors such as “donot” being written as one word.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.