Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In the present day, many individuals around the globe still face food shortages, even though there have been many breakthoughs in the field of agriculture. One of the reasons for this is that in today's capitalist world, investors hoard the cultivated crops and sell them for higher prices in cities. Governments must regulate the distribution of agricultural output using regulated policies to ensure no individual goes hungry.

Most of the agricultural land is owned by feudals. These people employ farmers to grow crops and store them in their barns. The sole motive of these feudals is to earn profit and gain financial rewards. This is why they only sell the crops in urban areas and upscale cities where they can charge higher prices and reap more profits. This in turn, means that less affluent areas do not get their proper share of the harvest and cannot afford the expensive prices, thus not being able to consume food. For example in Pakistan, a few elite families control all the agricultural land, they cultivate the crop and send it to big cities to be sold, thus depriving rural areas of their share and increasing the problem of food insecurity.

Governments are responsible for their citizens, and they must ensure the equal distribution of food throughout all areas. Rules must be established to force these landlords to transport a specific share to remote areas where it can be sold at regulated prices. This will allow the less fortunate to purchase items like vegetables and save themselves from hunger. For example, in India the price of salt has been fixed and a railway network has been established to transport the goods to the countryside. Fair distribution and price control mechanisms are necessary to improve the problem of hunger.

In conclusion, even after significant improvements in the methods of farming leading to increased output, only the landlords are benefitting while poorer people still face food scarcity. The government should outline laws to improve food transportation throughout the country and govern its price so that it may not be sold at higher prices.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both questions: you explain hunger through unequal control and distribution of crops, then propose government rules, transport to remote areas, and price regulation. The Pakistan example supports the cause, while the India example illustrates a possible intervention. Your position is clear in the introduction and conclusion. This meets the task well, but some ideas are not fully developed: the explanation focuses almost entirely on landlords and urban markets, without considering other causes such as conflict, poverty, or food waste. The salt-price example also needs a clearer link to food access, since salt is not a staple food that directly demonstrates how hunger would be reduced. Develop the proposed measures with more specific explanation of their likely effects.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a coherent overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the cause and solution, and a conclusion that restates the main position. Ideas generally progress logically, and linking expressions such as “This in turn” and “For example” help connect explanation and evidence. However, some cohesion is mechanical or repetitive, particularly the repeated references to “these people,” “the crops,” and “the government.” The opening also presents a solution before the body has explained the cause, which slightly disrupts the development. In the example about Pakistan, the long sentence joins several claims with commas, making the relationship between them less clear. Use more varied referencing and divide complex explanations into clearer steps.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “food shortages,” “agricultural output,” “food insecurity,” “distribution,” and “price control mechanisms.” These choices make the central argument clear, and some less common terms show an effort to discuss the issue precisely. However, several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or awkward: “breakthoughs” is misspelled, “feudals” is not the natural term for landowners, and “improve the problem of hunger” is not idiomatic. “Regulate … using regulated policies” is also repetitive. Greater precision in describing land ownership, food access, and policy measures would strengthen the argument. Check spelling and choose collocations that sound natural in formal academic writing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including subordinate clauses such as “even though there have been…” and “where they can charge higher prices.” Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, and errors rarely obstruct understanding. Some punctuation and sentence-boundary issues remain. For instance, “For example in Pakistan, a few elite families control all the agricultural land, they cultivate the crop…” joins independent clauses with commas; use a full stop or a suitable conjunction. Add a comma after introductory “For example,” and avoid the extra space in “vegetables and save.” The sentence beginning “This in turn” would also read more clearly with commas around the introductory phrase. More consistent punctuation and control of longer sentences would improve accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.