Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-10
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Nowadays agriculture has improved significantly due to modern technology and new farming methods. However many people around the world still do not have enough food to eat. This essay will discuss maim reason for this problem and suggest some solutions.
There are several reasons why people suffer from hunger. One main reason is poverty because people cannot afford to buy food due to lack of money. Another reason is the unequal distribution of food alot of food is wasted people in different areas have not enough food to eat. Moreover Natural disasters such as floods they damage the crops and reduce food production. For example farmers loose their crops due to heavy rains and it can led to food shortage.
There are several ways to solve this problem. Firstly governments should provide financial support to poor families so that they can buy basic food items. Secondly food should be distributed fairly among people and food waste should be reduced. Supermarkets and restaurants could donate extra food to charities instead of throwing it away.
In conclusion poverty unequal food distribution and natural disasters are some of the main reasons why people still go hungry despite improvements in agriculture. However governments and organisations can reduce this problem by supporting poor families reducing food waste and helping farmers increase food production.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You address both questions by identifying causes—poverty, unequal food distribution and natural disasters—and proposing responses such as financial support, fairer distribution and food donations. These points are relevant, but several are only briefly stated: for instance, you mention poverty without explaining why agricultural advances do not make food affordable, and the example about heavy rain is not developed beyond crop loss. The conclusion summarises your main points, although the essay’s position is largely a list rather than a developed explanation. The response is also 32 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to explain and support your ideas. Develop each cause and solution with a clearer explanation or specific example.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, a paragraph on causes, a paragraph on solutions and a conclusion. This makes the main progression easy to follow, and signposts such as “One main reason,” “Moreover” and “Firstly” help readers recognise the stages of your argument. However, some connections are mechanical, and the sentence beginning “Another reason is the unequal distribution of food” runs several ideas together without clear punctuation or linking. The relationship between food waste and unequal distribution could also be made more explicit. Use complete sentences and vary your transitions; for example, explain how food waste contributes to shortages in particular communities before moving to the proposed solution.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the central ideas, including “poverty,” “unequal distribution,” “natural disasters,” “food production” and “financial support.” These choices are relevant, but the range is limited and some wording is imprecise or repetitive, particularly repeated uses of “food” and “problem.” There are also noticeable spelling and word-choice errors, such as “alot,” “loose” where you mean “lose,” and “maim” instead of “main.” These do not prevent the reader from understanding the overall message, but they reduce precision. Aim to use accurate collocations and a few more specific terms, such as “food insecurity,” “crop yields” and “food supply,” while checking spelling carefully.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You communicate through mostly straightforward sentences and attempt some complex structures, including “so that they can buy basic food items” and “instead of throwing it away.” Meaning is generally understandable, but some sentence boundaries and grammatical forms need more control. For example, “Another reason is the unequal distribution of food alot of food is wasted” joins independent ideas without punctuation or a linking word; “such as floods they damage the crops” also needs restructuring. In “it can led to food shortage,” the modal “can” should be followed by the base verb, and the sentence needs an article or plural form for “food shortage.” Use a wider mix of accurately controlled sentence patterns and proofread punctuation, articles and verb forms.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.