Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

New emerging tecnologies also made advancement in agriculture sector. Many farmers around the world are trying to shift agriculture on automation. A few decades ago agriculture was considerd as on of the most challenging work but today technology has made it more convinient. For instance, a few years ago farmers were using natural ferilizers but nowadays farmers are using chemicals which are growth stimulant.

With such ongoing advances in agriculture, still many people are viticm to hunger. The major reason behind this is the low economy rate and less purchasing power. This case also varry according to the countries economic conditions. Let's say in a third world country the hunger rate would be more high as compared to a developed country. Another reason could be the increasing population. This makes it difficult for the govenrment to manage the demand ans supply. In many third wolrd countries, low job opportunites also leads to hunger.

If we move on to the solution, many victims of hunger consider the government accountable. They arises a question for the accountability for curroption, high taxes, low job rate, increasing population etc. In my opinion, it is the responsibility of the goverment to provide the work opputunities so that the people can overcome hunger. Many countries are still working to decreases hunger rate. For example, in developed countries such as America, Autralia, UK, Canada their is low hunger rate because many oppurtunities are given to people to earn a better lifestyle despite of advancement in agriculture sector. These countries are also working on import and export of agricultural goods.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both questions: you identify low purchasing power, population growth and limited employment as causes, then propose government action to create jobs. Your position that governments have responsibility is also clear. However, the explanation of why agricultural progress does not prevent hunger is only partly developed: the response does not clearly connect advances in production with problems such as unequal access, distribution or affordability. The proposed solutions are also narrow; job creation is explained, but the references to accountability and trade are not developed into specific measures. The country comparisons are broad and would be more convincing with a concrete example or explanation. Develop the causes and solutions more fully and show how each directly relates to hunger.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: it introduces agricultural change, discusses causes, and then moves to solutions. Paragraphing helps the reader follow this structure, and signposts such as “The major reason” and “If we move on to the solution” make the stages clear. Some connections are less smooth or precise, however. “With such ongoing advances in agriculture, still many people are victim to hunger” does not clearly explain the contrast, while “This case” has an unclear reference. The final paragraph also shifts from government accountability to job opportunities and then imports and exports without showing how these points connect. Use clearer links between each cause and its corresponding solution, and make references explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “purchasing power,” “demand and supply,” “job opportunities,” and “import and export.” These choices show an attempt to discuss economic causes and policy responses. However, the range is limited and several noticeable spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision, such as “viticm,” “curroption,” “oppurtunities,” and “growth stimulant.” Some phrases are also unnatural or imprecise, including “low economy rate” and “hunger rate would be more high.” Aim for accurate collocations and forms, such as “low income,” “food insecurity,” and “economic conditions.” Proofreading spelling and choosing more precise terms would make your meaning clearer and more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional comparison beginning “Let's say in a third world country” and a reason clause with “because.” The main ideas are generally understandable, but errors in verb forms, agreement, articles and sentence construction occur across the response. For example, “agriculture was considerd” needs a past participle, and “low job opportunites also leads” has a subject–verb agreement problem. In “They arises a question,” the verb form and pronoun construction are faulty; “their is low hunger rate” also contains an incorrect verb and article use. Practise checking each sentence’s subject and verb, and build accurate complex sentences before adding more variety.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.