Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-16
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Even after the introduction of the new technologies in agriculture, many residents around the globe still go hungry.
the issue is primarily driven by uneven distribution of food and economic inquality, but targeted through various solutions.
Firstly, the overall distibution of the food plays a big role in this problem as many countries distribute the vegetables and fruits unevenly. In addition to that many rural areas are not able to get enough food. owing to the bad connectivity and transport facillities. On the top of that many citizens who live in rural area are poor. As a result they cannot afford it, consequently they does not have enough food to eat. Secondly, because they does not have good storage equipments like fridge, they need to buy food on daily basis. Thirdly, their income and work might be irregular, due to this they can purchase the food if they got work to do work. Unfortunately if they are not able to find a job or a small task that owe them money, they need to sleep hungry.
There are some solutions to cure this toubles. Government should take an initiative and start some organisations which can help poors and remote areas to fulfill their necessary needs of food. Similarly, some businessmen or well known celebrities who have good earnings can help these unfortunate people by providing them groceries or healthy food. However there are already some celebrities like Gautam gambhir and Salman kahn who run the organisations which give food at negligible amount to poverts on daily basis.
In conclusion, this problem is severe as in spite of good facilities we are unable to cope it till now and the number is still growing, but there are some initiatives that could be taken by government in order to fulfill the daily requirement of food to poor households.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both questions: you explain hunger through unequal food distribution, poor transport and storage, poverty, and irregular work, then suggest government support and charitable food provision. These are relevant causes and responses, and the examples of organisations associated with Gautam Gambhir and Salman Khan make the proposed help more concrete. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explained. For instance, the link between rural transport and food shortages could be developed with a clearer account of how it affects supply or prices, while the solutions remain broad and do not explain how government organisations would reach people or operate. Your conclusion restates the problem and calls for action, but the claim that the number is growing is not supported. Develop and support the main ideas more evenly.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph explaining causes, a paragraph proposing solutions, and a conclusion. Sequencing words such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the main stages of the argument. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical, and several links between ideas are unclear. In the causes paragraph, “On the top of that” introduces poverty, but the following sentences repeat the affordability point and use “consequently” without a smooth connection. The phrase “due to this they can purchase the food if they got work” also makes the relationship between irregular employment and buying food difficult to follow. Use fewer formulaic transitions and make each sentence’s connection to the previous idea explicit; clearer paragraph-level progression would strengthen the organisation.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “uneven distribution,” “transport facilities,” “storage,” “irregular” income, and “remote areas.” These choices show an attempt to discuss causes and solutions beyond very basic terms. However, spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural word combinations are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause: “inquality,” “distibution,” “facillities,” and “toubles” are examples. Phrases such as “cure this troubles,” “fulfill their necessary needs of food,” and “organisations which give food at negligible amount” are not idiomatic or precise. Build accuracy by checking spelling and learning common collocations, such as “address food insecurity,” “meet basic food needs,” and “provide meals at a low cost.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including cause-and-effect structures such as “As a result…” and a conditional idea about people finding work. This gives the response some variety, and the main message is generally understandable. However, errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence boundaries recur. For example, “they does not have enough food” should be “they do not have enough food,” and “because they does not have” repeats the agreement problem. “If they got work” does not fit the intended general situation; use “if they get work.” The opening of the second paragraph begins with a lowercase letter, and “owing to the bad connectivity…” is left as a sentence fragment. Review subject–verb agreement and ensure dependent clauses are attached to complete sentences.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.