Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In recent years,thechnology made farming more easier than past years;however,a wide range of individuals are still hungry around the world.In this essay there are several reasons of this trend ,and also it can be addresed by government to provide financial aid.I will discuss in the upcoming paragraphs.

There are several reasons of why a huge numbers of people are living in hungerness.The first and foremost, the increasing of climate changes.In other words,due to climate changes there are a different natural disasters are create in the worls such as floods, droughts and many more.As a result,it is directly connected to the agriculture and it can harmful for the crops.Therefore,it is very difficults for the farmers to produce crops in the droughts and floods condition.Additionally,the second cause is the unemployment in the countries.To explain,a wide range of people dont have jobs and they are not able to provide food,house and clothes to their families because of a poverty.Consequently,a low income families can not afford a meal for themselves and their families , so they can live still hungry.

This issue can be solved by governments and developed countries.To elaborate, governments should help to individuals to provide financial aid in their nations.As a result, nobody can stay hungry in their own nations.Also,government should offer foods,clothes and house to the low income families because they can live a comfortable life.To add more,developed countries can help to developing nations to provide a basic aid, it also create stron bond between two nations.

In conclusion,there are a several reasons of people are living hungry such as climate changesin the world,unemployment,however,it can be solved by governments to provide financial aid.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both questions: climate-related disasters and unemployment are offered as causes, while government support and aid from developed countries are proposed as responses. These ideas are relevant, but they are only partly developed. For example, you say floods and droughts harm crops, but do not explain how this leads to hunger across different regions or why agricultural advances fail to reach those affected. The proposed financial aid and food, clothing, and housing are also broad; explain how assistance would improve access to food or support farming. Your position is clear in general, though the introduction’s claim that governments can provide financial aid is not developed into a specific solution. More explanation and a relevant example would make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, a paragraph on causes, one on solutions, and a conclusion. The reader can follow the main progression from reasons for hunger to possible action. You also use linking expressions such as “As a result,” “Additionally,” and “In conclusion,” which help signal relationships between ideas. However, some transitions feel mechanical or do not accurately express the connection, and repeated sequencing phrases such as “The first and foremost” and “the second cause” make the discussion formulaic. Within paragraphs, several ideas are joined in long strings, so the relationship between claims is not always clear. Use fewer, more precise connectors and separate cause, consequence, and example into clearly linked sentences.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “climate changes,” “natural disasters,” “droughts,” “unemployment,” and “financial aid,” so the reader can identify the subject and main ideas. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate or unnatural choices make parts of the response difficult to read. Phrases such as “living in hungerness,” “a huge numbers,” and “strong bond” do not express the intended meaning naturally; “hunger,” “a huge number,” and “stronger ties” would be more appropriate. There are also spelling errors, including “thechnology,” “worls,” and “addresed.” Build a bank of accurate collocations for food insecurity and agricultural support, and check spelling and word forms during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including cause-and-effect structures with “because” and “as a result.” This gives the response some variety, but complex sentences are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make reading less smooth. For example, “there are a different natural disasters are create” combines incompatible structures, while “it can harmful” is missing a verb form. Agreement and sentence construction are also problematic in “a low income families can not afford a meal.” Punctuation is inconsistent, particularly where commas and spaces are missing after introductory phrases. Practise building accurate clauses first, then combine them using conjunctions; check subject–verb agreement, articles, and complete verb phrases.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.