Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.

Why is this the case?

What can be done about this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Despite the growing advancement in agriculture and technology, people all over the world still experience hunger. I believe that this is due to improper distribution and limited access of produce. The situation can be mitigated with fair allocation of resources and minimizing food waste.

In detail, agriculture has adapted to the continuous change in technology. Despite of this modernization, many people are still hungry. One factor is food distribution, developed countries can procure and import foods for their people while third world countries such as the Philippines lacks the funding to sustain the supply. Additionally, even if lands are producing crops the access to it have several setbacks such as distance, middleman and pricing. For instance, the Philippines produce quality crops but farmers are taken advantage by the middleman,offering them a lowball price. Thus resulting to high volume of unsold produce and lesser pay.

Meanwhile, this worldwide problem can be managed by advocating the public to minimize food waste. For example, in school cafeteria, students should be required to get what they can consume. This would lessen food waste and untounched leftovers can be donated to charitable institutions. Another possible solution is fair allocation and access to food. The government can implement a regulation on how farmers can sell their products fairly without the presence of middleman. This would help them reach consumers and supermarket owners without the fear of being played with unreasonable pricing.

In conclusion, many people around the world still go hungry for several reasons. Food distribution between nations disrupts the balance to access food. Furthermore, farmers usually suffer the most because they are being held by middleman by buying their crops with lower selling value. Lastly, this can be addressed by the government through regulations and protection of farmers while convincing the public to minimize wasting food.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both questions and maintain a clear overall position: hunger persists because food is distributed unfairly and access is limited, while fairer allocation and reduced waste could help. The Philippines example gives the explanation some concrete support, and the proposed school and government measures are relevant. This meets the task well, with some development beyond a basic response. However, the causes and solutions are not equally explored: the point about international distribution is asserted rather than explained, and the school-waste example is narrower than the global problem. Develop the links between these factors and hunger, and explain how the proposed measures could improve access for people most affected.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for causes and solutions, and a conclusion that returns to the main points. Sequencing is generally easy to follow, and signposts such as “Additionally,” “For instance,” and “In conclusion” help guide the reader. This shows sound organisation, though some cohesion is mechanical and a few links are unclear. For example, “Thus resulting to high volume of unsold produce and lesser pay” is a fragment, so the relationship between the farmers’ low prices and hunger is not fully connected. The conclusion also repeats points rather than synthesising them. Use complete sentences and clearer references to show how each example supports the central argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “food distribution,” “fair allocation,” “food waste,” and “charitable institutions.” These choices make the main ideas clear, and terms such as “middleman” help convey the local example. There are also attempts at more specific phrasing, but some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or informal, which limits precision: “lowball price,” “being played with unreasonable pricing,” and “lesser pay” do not fit the academic tone naturally. “Untounched” is also misspelled, and “access of produce” is an awkward phrase. Aim for more precise collocations and consistent formal wording, such as “access to food,” “unfairly low prices,” and “unsold food.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including “Despite the growing advancement…” and the conditional idea “even if lands are producing crops…”. Meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors remain and occasionally make relationships less clear. Examples include “Despite of this modernization” (the construction should be “Despite this modernization”), “the Philippines lacks” after the plural subject “countries,” and “the access to it have” where the subject and verb do not agree. The sentence beginning “Thus resulting…” is a fragment, while “farmers are taken advantage by the middleman” is missing the required passive construction. Review agreement, verb forms, and sentence boundaries, and check each complex sentence for a complete main clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.