Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-07-27

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The pie-charts illustrates the three different type of nutrients, i.e. Sodium, Saturated fats, and Added sugar, found in four different meals consumed in the USA, which may be cause health issues if consumed above certain limit.

Overall, major chunk of sodium and saturated fat is consumed in the dinner while added sugars are ingested in snacks. Similarly, saturated fat and added sugar is least found in breakfast. Lunch remains balanced out where all three nutrients are present in some quantity.

72 percent of sodium is consumed in lunch and dinner, while 63 percent of saturated in same meals, added sugar only constitute 42% in these meals. Sodium is found equally in breakfast and snacks, i.e. 14 percent each, similarly 37% of saturated fat comes from snacks and breakfast. Most of added sugar is found is snack and 58 percent of which is consumed in breakfast and snacks.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 150 words, which negatively impacts the score. While you have identified the main features and made relevant comparisons, the analysis is somewhat mechanical. You have successfully highlighted the key trends, such as the high consumption of sodium and saturated fat in dinner and the prevalence of added sugar in snacks. However, the data reporting is slightly confusing in the final paragraph, particularly regarding the grouping of percentages. To improve, ensure you provide a more comprehensive overview and double-check your data points to ensure clarity for the reader. The failure to reach the minimum length prevents a higher score.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized into an introduction, an overview, and a body paragraph. You use some cohesive devices such as 'Overall', 'Similarly', and 'while', which help the flow of information. However, the progression of ideas in the final paragraph is slightly disjointed, and the referencing of data could be smoother. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the overview from the specific details. To reach a higher band, focus on using a wider variety of linking words and ensure that each sentence transitions naturally into the next without relying on repetitive structures.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'nutrients', 'ingested', and 'constitute'. There are some minor inaccuracies in word choice and phrasing, such as 'major chunk' (which is informal) and 'pie-charts illustrates' (subject-verb agreement error). The vocabulary is sufficient to convey the main points, but it lacks the precision and sophistication required for higher bands. To improve, try to incorporate more academic collocations and avoid informal expressions. Ensure you proofread for basic errors like pluralization and subject-verb agreement.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are several grammatical errors that occur throughout the text, such as 'The pie-charts illustrates' (subject-verb agreement), 'three different type' (pluralization), and 'saturated fat and added sugar is least found' (subject-verb agreement). While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to affect the overall clarity. To improve, focus on mastering subject-verb agreement and consistent pluralization. Increasing the variety of complex sentence structures while maintaining accuracy will also help raise your score.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.